Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling has become standard clinical practice in the management of advanced lung cancer. In addition to tissue and plasma, other body fluids are also being actively explored as alternative sources of tumor DNA. This study investigated the utility of induced sputum obtained from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for somatic variation profiling.Methods: Our study included 41 treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with locally advanced to advanced NSCLC between October 2018 and June 2019. Capture-based targeted sequencing was performed on matched tumor, plasma, and induced sputum samples of 41 patients using a 168-gene panel. We analyzed the somatic variations detected from each sample type and the concordance of variations detected between matched samples. The concordance rate was defined as the proportion of the total number of variations detected from one sample type relative to the reference sample type.Results: Comparative analysis on the somatic variation detection using matched tumor samples as a reference revealed detection rates of 76.9% for plasma, 72.4% for sputum-supernatant, and 65.7% for sputum-sediment samples. Plasma, sputum-supernatant, and sputum-sediment achieved positive predictive values of 73.3%, 80.4%, and 55.6% and sensitivities of 50.0%, 36.9%, 31.3%, respectively, relative to tumor samples for 168 genes. Sputum-supernatants had significantly higher concordance rates relative to matched tumor samples (69.2% vs. 37.8%; P=0.031) and maximum allelic fraction (P<0.001) than their matched sputum-sediments. Sputum-supernatants had comparable detection rates (71.4% vs. 67.9%; P=1.00) but with significantly higher maximum allelic fraction than their matched plasma samples (P=0.003). Furthermore, sputum-supernatant from smokers had a significantly higher maximum allelic fraction than sputumsupernatant from non-smokers (P=0.021).Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that supernatant fraction from induced sputum is a better sampling source than its sediment and performs comparably to plasma samples. Induced sputum from NSCLC patients could serve as an alternative media for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based somatic variation profiling.
PurposeThe coexistence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often leads to a worse prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, approaches targeting specific genetic alterations have been shown to significantly improve the diagnosis and treatment outcomes of patients with NSCLC. Herein, we sought to evaluate the impact of COPD on the clinical manifestations and gene mutation profiles of NSCLC patients with both circulating tumor (ctDNA) and tumor DNA (tDNA).Materials and methodsThe influence of COPD on clinical features was observed in 285 NSCLC cohorts suffering from NSCLC alone, NSCLC coexisting with COPD, or NSCLC coexisting with prodromal changes in COPD (with emphysema, bullae, or chronic bronchitis). The gene mutation profiles of specific 168 NSCLC-related genes were further analyzed in the NSCLC sub-cohorts with formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor DNA (FFPE tDNA) samples and plasma circulating tumor DNA (PLA ctDNA) samples. Moreover, mutation concordance was assessed in tDNA and paired ctDNA of 110 NSCLC patients.ResultsRelative to patients with NSCLC alone, patients with NSCLC coexisting with COPD and prodromal changes presented with worse lung functions, more clinical symptoms, signs and comorbidities, and inconsistent gene mutation profiles. In addition, patients in the latter two groups exhibited a higher average frequency of gene mutation. Lastly, mutation concordance between tDNA and ctDNA samples was significantly reduced in NSCLC patients coexisting with COPD.ConclusionsCollectively, our findings revealed that coexistence of COPD leads to worse clinical manifestations and altered gene mutation profiles in patients with NSCLC. Additionally, for NSCLC patients with COPD, the use of ctDNA instead of tDNA may not be the most efficient approach to identifying gene mutations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.