No abstract

Background: Although the risks of using central nervous system depressant (CNS-D) medications with alcohol are well documented, little is known about trends in prescribed use of these medications among individuals who regularly consume alcohol (i.e., trends in "concurrent use"). We examined changes in the prevalence of prescribed CNS-D medications among individuals who drank alcohol on 52 or more occasions in the past year ("regular drinking"). CNS-D medications included sedative-hypnotics (subclassified as anxiolytics or sleep medications) and opioids.Methods: We used 8 cross-sectional cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2000 to 2013-2014) from participants aged 20 and older (n = 37,709). We used log-binomial regression to examine (i) prevalence trends of prescribed CNS-D medication use, (ii) trend differences by drinking status, and (iii) correlates of CNS-D medication use.Results: Among those who drink regularly, the relative annual increase in prevalence of sedativehypnotic use was 5.3% (95% CI: 2.7 to 7.9): Anxiolytic and sleep medication use increased annually by 3.7% (95% CI: 0.8 to 6.7) and 11.2% (95% CI: 6.5 to 16.0), respectively. Opioid use trends among those who drink regularly were not statistically significant but were nonlinear. Differences in CNS-D medication trends between those who drink regularly and those who drink infrequently/abstain were not statistically significant. Those who drink regularly were less likely than those who drink infrequently/abstain to use opioids (adjusted relative risk [ARR]: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.78) and anxiolytics (ARR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.81), but not sleep medications (ARR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.35). Those aged 40 and older were 2 to 5 times as likely as those aged 20 to 29 to use sedative-hypnotics.Conclusions: Among those who drink regularly, the prevalence of prescribed sedative-hypnotic use increased and prescribed opioid use remained common. These trends indicate that a substantial portion of the population is at risk of alcohol-related adverse drug reactions-particularly those aged 40 and older.

No abstract

Although the prevalence of malignancy in average risk women under age 40 presenting with a palpable breast abnormality is low, the management of benign‐appearing palpable abnormalities remains controversial. This study assesses the imaging evaluation, subsequent management, and outcomes of women under age 40 presenting with a palpable area of concern. This study also evaluates the costs, utility, and outcomes of BI‐RADS 3 assessment in this patient population. A single institution retrospective case review from July 2010 through June 2013 identified women under age 40 presenting with a new palpable breast abnormality. Diagnostic imaging evaluation was performed. BI‐RADS assessments and recommendations were recorded prospectively. Outcome was determined by tissue diagnosis, 2 years of surveillance, or search of the hospital tumor registry. Performance measures were calculated. Among 1440 cases, 1052 were initially assessed as BI‐RADS 1 or 2 (73.1%), 184 as BI‐RADS 3 (12.8%), 182 as BI‐RADS 4 (12.6%), and 22 as BI‐RADS 5 (1.5%). In all, 30 breast malignancies were diagnosed (cancer yield 2.1%). All 30 cancers were initially categorized as BI‐RADS 4 or 5. No BI‐RADS 1, 2, or 3 findings proved malignant. The imaging evaluation sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 87.7%, and accuracy was 87.9%. The negative predictive value was 100% and the positive predictive value was 14.7%. Average risk women under age 40 presenting with a palpable abnormality have a low prevalence of breast cancer. Imaging evaluation has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, thereby allowing for confident characterization and appropriate management recommendations. For palpable solid masses with benign imaging features in women under age 40, short‐term interval follow‐up with subsequent periodic imaging or clinical examination for a total of 2 years is a cost‐effective and safe alternative to biopsy.