Approximately 10% of patients with hypertension have resistant hypertension, even if adequate pharmacological therapy is established. In this regard, renal nerve ablation (RNA) could represent a valid alternative treatment option. In a retrospective analysis with a follow-up of 6, 12, and 24 months, the authors investigated the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal artery ablation in 57 patients undergoing RNA with multiple renal nerve ablation in both renal arteries. In addition to medical antihypertensive therapy (4.2 ± 1.4 drugs per patient), RNA using three different ablation systems was performed in patients with confirmed resistant hypertension (systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg in spite of three drugs including a diuretic). The primary end point was the change in office ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up after RNA. The primary safety end point was the change in plasma creatinine levels after 12 and 24 months compared with baseline. The mean office systolic blood pressure at baseline was 167.6 ± 22.4 and after 6, 12, and 24 months averaged 143.5 ± 21.1 (P < .05), 141.1 ± 21.1 (P < .05), and 139.4 ± 19.6 mm Hg (P < .05) respectively, with an average of 15.1 ± 5.3 nerve ablations performed. No significant changes in plasma creatinine levels were observed at 12 months (P = .421) and at 24 months (P = .217). There were no complications after RNA nor any relevant adverse vascular, renal, or cardiovascular events observed except in one patient in whom a covered stent had to be placed at the femoral puncture site. In this study, in all patients with resistant hypertension, RNA, if performed adequately in the number of ablations and energy delivery, is an efficient and safe treatment option to lower office and 24-hour blood pressure. Whether these blood pressure-lowering effects will lead to a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality will require further studies.
Funding information TFL has received research grants from Boston Scientific and St. Jude Medical and consulting honoraria from Medtronic and St. Jude Medical. IS and AJF received lecture honoraria from Medtronic. FR reports grant support for the ESC-HFA Postgraduate Course in Heart Failure from Novartis, Servier, Bayer, Abbott and Astra Zeneca and the VASCEND trial from Novartis (all payments directly to the University of Zurich). FR has been paid for the time spent as a committee member for clinical trials, advisory boards, other forms of consulting and lectures or presentations. These payments were made directly to the University of Zurich and no personal payments were received in relation to these trials or other activities since January 2018.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.