Driveline infections are common in HMII recipients but primarily remain superficial and are reasonably easy to manage. Infectious agents mostly originate from the skin and gastrointestinal tract. Blood biomarkers did not appear to be helpful in detecting driveline infections.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Glycated haemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) has limitations as a glycemic marker for patients with diabetes and CKD and for those receiving dialysis. Glycated albumin is an alternative glycemic marker, and some studies have found that glycated albumin more accurately reflects glycemic control than HbA_1c in these groups. However, several factors are known to influence the value of glycated albumin including proteinuria. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is another alternative to HbA_1c. CGM allows one to assess mean glucose, glucose variability, and the time spent in hypo-, normo-, and hyperglycemia. Currently, several different CGM models are approved for use in patients receiving dialysis; CKD (not on dialysis) is not a contraindication in any of these models. Some devices are for blind recording, while others provide real-time data to patients. Small studies suggest that CGM could improve glycemic control in hemodialysis patients, but this has not been studied for individual CKD stages. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Glycated albumin and CGM avoid the pitfalls of HbA_1c in CKD and dialysis populations. However, the value of glycated albumin may be affected by several factors. CGM provides a precise estimation of the mean glucose. Here, we discuss the strengths and limitations for using HbA1c, glycated albumin, or CGM in CKD and dialysis population. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Glycated albumin is an alternative glycemic marker but is affected by proteinuria. CGM provides a precise estimation of mean glucose and glucose variability. It remains unclear if CGM improves glycemic control in the CKD and dialysis populations.

Introduction: Treatment of fluid overload and anemia remains a challenge in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Hypervolemia can be evaluated using a carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing method by which blood volume (BV), plasma volume (PV), and red blood cell volumes (RBCV) can be determined. We hypothesized that recurrent hypervolemia would cause hemoglobin (Hb) levels to be in the anemic range without a concurrent reduction in RBCV in patients undergoing hemodialysis.Methods: BV, PV, and RBCV were determined by a CO rebreathing test in 19 patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing chronic hemodialysis. The tests were performed 20 minutes before initiating dialysis, and the measured intravascular volumes were compared with predicted normal intravascular volumes according to Nadler's equation. Before initiating dialysis, Hb and blood pressure were measured, and edema severity was graded.Findings: Measured BV was higher in 17 out of the 19 patients with a median of 71.1 (62.4--76.9) mL/kg and higher than the predicted BV of 58.3 (53.5-59.9) mL/kg (P < 0.001). The measured PV was found to be higher in all patients. RBCV was measured as 25.2 (23.4-28.2) mL/kg with a predicted volume of 25.9 (22.4-26.7) mL/kg (P = 0.56). Eighteen patients were anemic as determined by Hb concentrations (defined as Hb < 13 g/dL for men and <12 g/dL for women), and nine were anemic according to RBCV. Discussion:The CO rebreathing test is a new approach to measuring intravascular volumes in hemodialysis patients. Compared with predicted intravascular volumes, the predialysis BV was expanded in the majority with elevated PV as the main cause. No overall difference in RBCV was found between the measured and predicted volumes. According to predialysis Hb levels, all but one patient was anemic, but according to the measured RBCV, only nine were in the anemic range, indicating dilution of Hb.