Introduction Despite the growing evidence base for psychotropic drug
treatment in pediatric patients, knowledge about the benefit-risk ratio in
clinical practice remains limited. The ‘Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
(TDM)-VIGIL’ study aimed to evaluate serious adverse drug reactions
(ADRs) in children and adolescents treated with antidepressants and/or
antipsychotics in approved (‘on-label’), and off-label use in
clinical practice.
Methods Psychiatric pediatric patients aged 6-18 years treated with
antidepressants and/or antipsychotics either on-label or off-label were
prospectively followed between October 2014 and December 2018 within a
multicenter trial. Follow-up included standardized assessments of response,
serious ADRs and therapeutic drug monitoring.
Results 710 youth (age=14.6±2.2 years,
female=66.6%) were observed for 5.5 months on average;
76.3% received antidepressants, 47.5% antipsychotics, and
25.2% both. Altogether, 55.2% of the treatment episodes with
antidepressants and 80.7% with antipsychotics were off-label. Serious
ADRs occurred in 8.3% (95%CI=6.4–10.6%)
of patients, mainly being psychiatric adverse reactions (77.4%),
predominantly suicidal ideation and behavior. The risk of serious ADRs was not
significantly different between patients using psychotropics off-label and
on-label (antidepressants: 8.1% vs. 11.3%, p=0.16;
antipsychotics: 8.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.67). Serious ADRs
occurred in 16.6% of patients who were suicidal at enrollment versus
5.6% of patients who were not suicidal (relative risk 3.0,
95%CI=1.9-4.9).
Conclusion Off-label use of antidepressants and antipsychotics in youth
was not a risk factor for the occurrence of serious ADRs in a closely monitored
clinical setting. Results from large naturalistic trials like ours can
contribute to bridging the gap between knowledge from randomized controlled
trials and real-world clinical settings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.