BackgroundImmobilization is an appropriate tool to ease the handling and recycling of enzymes in biocatalytic processes and to increase their stability. Most of the established immobilization methods require case-to-case optimization, which is laborious and time-consuming. Often, (chromatographic) enzyme purification is required and stable immobilization usually includes additional cross-linking or adsorption steps. We have previously shown in a few case studies that the molecular biological fusion of an aggregation-inducing tag to a target protein induces the intracellular formation of protein aggregates, so called inclusion bodies (IBs), which to a certain degree retain their (catalytic) function. This enables the combination of protein production and immobilization in one step. Hence, those biologically-produced immobilizates were named catalytically-active inclusion bodies (CatIBs) or, in case of proteins without catalytic activity, functional IBs (FIBs). While this strategy has been proven successful, the efficiency, the potential for optimization and important CatIB/FIB properties like yield, activity and morphology have not been investigated systematically.ResultsWe here evaluated a CatIB/FIB toolbox of different enzymes and proteins. Different optimization strategies, like linker deletion, C- versus N-terminal fusion and the fusion of alternative aggregation-inducing tags were evaluated. The obtained CatIBs/FIBs varied with respect to formation efficiency, yield, composition and residual activity, which could be correlated to differences in their morphology; as revealed by (electron) microscopy. Last but not least, we demonstrate that the CatIB/FIB formation efficiency appears to be correlated to the solvent-accessible hydrophobic surface area of the target protein, providing a structure-based rationale for our strategy and opening up the possibility to predict its efficiency for any given target protein.ConclusionWe here provide evidence for the general applicability, predictability and flexibility of the CatIB/FIB immobilization strategy, highlighting the application potential of CatIB-based enzyme immobilizates for synthetic chemistry, biocatalysis and industry.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12934-019-1081-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

E. coli HB101 pRK2013 Sm R , hsdR-M + , proA2, leuB6, thi-1, recA; harboring plasmid pRK2013 Ditta et al., 1980 E. coli DH5α pYTSK01K_0G7 DH5α harboring plasmid pYTSK01K_0G7 This study E. coli DH5α pVLT33-PA_rhlABC DH5α harboring plasmid pVLT33-PA_rhlABC Wittgens et al., 2017 E. coli DH5α pBNT Km DH5α harboring plasmid pBNTmcs(t)Km This study S. cerevisiae VL6-48 pYTSK10K_0G7_rhlAB VL6-48 harboring plasmid pYTSK10K_0G7_rhlAB This study E. coli DH5α pYTSK10K_1G7_rhlAB DH5α harboring plasmid pYTSK10K_1G7_rhlAB This study E. coli DH5α pRhon5Hi-2-eyfp DH5α harboring plasmid pRhon5Hi-2-eyfp Troost et al., 2019 S. cerevisiae VL6-48 pYTSK40K_1G7_rhlAB VL6-48 harboring plasmid pYTSK40K_1G7_rhlAB This study E. coli DH5α pYTSK40K_0G7_rhlAB DH5α harboring plasmid pYTSK40K_0G7_rhlAB This study E. coli S17-1 pYTSK40K_1G7_rhlAB S17-1 harboring plasmid pYTSK40K_1G7_rhlAB This study E. coli DH5αλpir pSK02 DH5α λpir harboring Tn7 delivery vector pSK02 for chromosomal integration Bator et al., 2020b E. coli DH5α pSW-2 DH5α harboring plasmid pSW-2 encoding I-SceI nuclease Martinez-Garcia and de Lorenzo, 2011 E. coli DH5αλpir pTNS-1 DH5α λpir harboring plasmid pTNS-1 Choi et al., 2005 E. coli DH5αλpir p pha DH5α λpir harboring plasmid p pha Mato Aguirre, 2019 E. coli PIR2 pEMG-flag1 PIR2 harboring plasmid pEMG-flag1 Blesken et al., 2020 E. coli PIR2 pEMG-flag2 PIR2 harboring plasmid pEMG-flag2 Blesken et al., 2020 E. coli DH5αλpir pMaW03 DH5α λpir harboring plasmid pMaW03 This study P. putida chassis strains P. putida KT2440 Wild type Bagdasarian et al., 1981 P. putida KT2440 flag PP_4328-PP_4344 and PP_4351-PP_4397 Blesken et al., 2020 P. putida KT2440 phaG PP_1408 This study P. putida KT2440 pha PP_5003-PP_5008 Blesken et al., 2020 P. putida KT2440 phaG pha PP_1408 and PP_5003-PP_5008 (phaC1ZC2DFI) This study P. putida KT2440 flag pha PP_4328-PP_4344, PP_4351-PP_4397 and PP_5003-PP_5008 This study P. putida strains used for biosurfactant production P. putida KT2440 pPS05 KT2440 harboring plasmid pPS05 Tiso et al., 2016 P. putida KT2440 SK4 rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg This study P. putida KT2440 sal mRL E SK40 rhlAB, eYFP, attTn7 integrated, P nagAa /nagR, Gm R , tnsABCD This study P. putida KT2440 flag SK4 PP_4328-PP_4344 and PP_4351-PP_4397, rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg Blesken et al., 2020 P. putida KT2440 phaG SK4 PP_1408, rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg This study P. putida KT2440 pha SK4 PP_5003-PP_5008, rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg Blesken et al., 2020 P. putida KT2440 phaG pha SK4 PP_1408 and PP_5003-PP_5008, rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg This study P. putida KT2440 flag pha SK4 PP_4328-PP_4344 and PP_4351-PP_4397 and PP_5003-PP_5008, rhlAB, attTn7 integrated, P 14ffg

CatIB properties can be tailored to the requirements of different reaction systems using two different coiled-coil domains as fusion tags.