Colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), two animal models designed to closely mimic the clinical course of intra-abdominal sepsis, were compared. In the past, immunomodulatory therapies developed in animal studies failed to be successful in humans. As a consequence, the established animal sepsis models were criticized. It has been proposed that present models had to be reevaluated, and new, clinically more relevant models should be evolved. CLP procedure was performed puncturing once (CLP[1]) or twice (CLP[2]) the ligated cecum of C57BL/6 mice. In the CASP model, a stent with defined diameter was surgically inserted into the ascending colon. Survival, bacterial load, immunohistochemistry, and serum cytokine levels were analyzed in the groups. Survival after CASP procedure correlated strongly with the stent diameter, whereas the number of punctures in CLP did not significantly change survival rate. Bacterial loads of peritoneal lavage, liver, and lung, as well as serum cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 10) steadily increased from 6 to 24 h after the CASP procedure. In contrast, continuously low amounts of bacteria and cytokines were found in CLP mice at any point of time. Twenty-four hours after CLP surgery, the ligated cecum was covered by adhesive small bowel loops, whereas in CASP mice, the intestinal leakage was then still present. The CASP model mimics closely the clinical course of diffuse peritonitis with early and steadily increasing systemic infection and inflammation (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). In contrast, CLP reveals a model of intra-abdominal abscess formation with sustained and minor signs of systemic inflammation.
TRAIL-treated mice are highly protected from abdominal sepsis. Because diagnosis and therapy are frequently delayed in human sepsis, it is remarkable that TRAIL is effective when given via a therapeutic approach. Therefore, this study suggests a therapeutic potential for TRAIL in human sepsis. This should be addressed in future trials.
Background: In postoperative sepsis, mortality is increased due to the surgically induced immune dysfunction. Further causes of this traumatic effect on the immune system include burn injuries and polytrauma, as well as endogenous traumata like stroke. Several animal models have been defined to analyse the characteristics of trauma-induced immune suppression. This article will correlate our results from animal studies and clinical observations with the recent literature on postoperative immune suppression. Methods: The previously described model of surgically induced immune dysfunction (SID) was performed in mice by laparotomy and manipulation of the small intestine in the antegrade direction. Blood samples were collected 6 and 72 h following SID to analyse the white blood cell count and corticosterone levels. To assess the postoperative immune status in humans, we analysed expression of HLA-DR on monocytes of 118 patients by flow cytometry prior to and 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. Results: The postoperative immune suppression in our SID model is characterised by lymphocytopenia and significantly increased corticosterone levels in mice dependent on the degree of surgical trauma. This is comparable to the postoperative situation in humans: major and especially long-lasting surgery results in a significantly reduced expression of HLA-DR on circulating monocytes. Previous studies describe a similar situation following burn injury and endogenous trauma, i.e. stroke. Conclusions: We suggest the completion of our previously published sepsis classification due to the immune status at the onset of sepsis: type A as the spontaneously acquired sepsis and type B as sepsis in trauma-induced pre-existing immune suppression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.