The isoform(s) of adenylyl cyclase (AC) present in human platelets has not been identified, and evidence supporting a role for AC in platelet aggregation is equivocal. We recently characterized deaggregation as an active component of the platelet aggregation response that may be an important determinant of the extent and duration of aggregation. G(i)-coupled receptors are linked to the inhibition of AC and are targets of antiplatelet drugs. They also affect platelet aggregation by modulating deaggregation, suggesting a role for AC in modulating this response. The purpose of this study was to identify the AC isoform(s) present in human platelets and to identify its physiological modulators. RT-PCR screening of platelet, buffy coat layer cell and bone marrow megakaryocyte cDNA, and Western blot analysis with AC type III (AC-III) antibodies identified AC-III in platelets and in megakaryocytes. Human platelet AC-III was cloned and expressed in HEK293 cells and its characteristics compared to native platelet AC. Both platelet AC and cloned AC-III required Mg(2+) for activity, were insensitive to Ca(2+) and were G(s)- and G(i)-coupled. Zn(2+) and SQ22536 inhibited platelet AC activity. The affinity of SQ22536 was increased with Mg(2+)-related stimulation of AC, while that of Zn(2+) was unchanged, which is consistent with a non-competitive interaction between the two metal ions on AC. The Zn(2+) chelator TPEN reversed the inhibitory effects of Zn(2+). This study identified AC-III as the predominant AC isoform in human platelets, the activity of which may affect the extent and duration of the net aggregation response by modulating deaggregation.
Deaggregation, the partial reversal of the initial aggregation of platelets is observed following low, but not higher, micromolar ADP concentrations. This study tested the hypothesis that deaggregation results from a balance between concurrent, opposing, aggregation and deaggregation processes which are ADP (adenosine 59 -diphosphate) receptor occupancy-dependent. Aggregation of human platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prepared in r-hirudin was assayed in a 96-well plate reader over 20 min by measurement of the optical density (OD) at 580 nm. Aggregation and the time to reach peak aggregation were directly proportional to ADP receptor occupancy. The magnitude and time course of the response to ADP were comparable to those previously reported with standard aggregometry. The rate constant of platelet deaggregation, as assessed by a fourcompartment kinetic model, was inversely proportional to agonist concentration. The ratio of the rate constants of aggregation and deaggregation was receptor occupancy-dependent and directly proportional to aggregation. Consequently, platelet aggregation was proportional, and deaggregation inversely proportional, to ADP receptor occupancy. We propose that the response of PRP to ADP and to 2-MeS-ADP (2-methylthioadenosinediphosphate), in vitro, consists of at least two active, concurrent processes, aggregation and deaggregation. Incremental occupancy of the P 2T ADP receptor subtype attenuates deaggregation and governs the balance between these two processes.
Single-receptor pharmacology does not satisfactorily explain the physiology of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation response. It has been shown that, in addition to Gq-coupled receptor activation, one Gi-coupled receptor, either the ADP P2T or the alpha2-adrenoceptor, is required for elicitation of aggregation. The underlying mechanism of this action, however, has not been elucidated. By systematically assaying the entire time course of the aggregation and its fade using two methods of aggregometry, we have investigated the role of graded activation of these two Gi-coupled receptors. We demonstrate that constant activation of either of two Gq-coupled receptors, the ADP P2Y1 or the 5-HT2A, and incremental activation of either of the two Gi-coupled receptors, tightly regulates the aggregation response in vitro, through the apparent release of a tonic inhibition of platelet aggregation. This tightly regulated release of inhibition, which appears analogous to the phenomena of disinhibition observed in the central nervous system, may be instrumental for the continuous adaptation of the aggregation response to variable physiological conditions.
Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) is recognized as an important mediator of platelet aggregation. Transient aggregation at low (< or =1 microM), and sustained aggregation at higher ADP concentrations are consistently observed. Dissociation of platelet aggregates has been described and may explain the reversible component of the aggregation response. We hypothesized that the net aggregation response to ADP in vitro results from the concurrent activation of two opposing processes, aggregation and deaggregation. Different purinergic receptor subtypes may mediate these effects. To test this hypothesis and its generalizability, we performed a kinetic analysis of representative published ADP-induced aggregation responses supplemented with original data from our laboratory. A four-compartment kinetic model was used to estimate k(3), a rate constant of deaggregation. Two model-independent parameters, the magnitude of the aggregation response (DeltaOD) and the time to reach maximal aggregation (t(peak)) were also assessed. Greater sustained aggregation at higher ADP concentrations was consistently associated with increased DeltaOD and t(peak) but decreased k(3) values. These relationships were independent of type of platelet preparation or experimental conditions and not due to ADP receptor desensitization. Conversely, blockade of the P2Y(12) receptor subtype (ticlopidine, clopidogrel or 2-MeS-AMP) decreased DeltaOD and t(peak) but increased k(3) values. This supports the presence of active deaggregation which is decelerated by activation of the P2Y(12) receptor subtype.
Platelet shape change (SC), aggregation and deaggregation responses are integral components of hemostasis that are elicited and modulated in vivo by the simultaneous activation of several membrane receptors. Selective activation of the purinergic P2Y1 receptor in vivo elicits a sustained SC and a small, transient aggregation response that is reversed rapidly by a robust deaggregation response (Platelets 2003; 14: 89). Using a kinetics-based turbidimetric approach to study the modulation of these concurrent components of human platelet responses, we demonstrate that these P2Y1 receptor-related responses and a number of their kinetic and steady-state characteristics are differentially elicited and modulated. P2Y1 receptor agonist concentrations that elicited aggregation (pEC50 for ADP, 2-MeSADP; 5.88, 6.69) were 10-fold greater than those that elicited SC (7.33, 7.67). The magnitude of the aggregation response was agonist concentration-dependent, saturable and was associated with an agonist concentration-dependent deceleration of the deaggregation response. Gi-coupled receptor (alpha 2A-adrenoceptor, EP3 and P2Y12 receptors) agonists also enhanced aggregation through deceleration of the deaggregation response, and an inhibitor of PI3K activity (wortmannin) inhibited aggregation through acceleration of the deaggregation response. Neither treatment affected the extent or the kinetics of the SC response. The aggregation but not the SC response was rapidly desensitized by P2Y1 receptor activation by ADP. The affinity of the presence of a single P2Y1 receptor subtype. The differential characteristics and modulation of the SC and aggregation responses by a single receptor support the idea that different signaling pathways activated at different occupancy states of the same receptor underlie the two responses. P2Y1 receptor-mediated platelet aggregation and SC responses provide a convenient model for studying the phenomenon of agonist-directed signaling by differential occupancy of the same membrane receptor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.