US or abdominal X-ray in children with possible appendicitis should be integrated with PAS to determine the next steps in management. In the case of discordance between the clinical findings and radiology, prolonged observation or further imaging are recommended.
Gastrointestinal duplikasyon (GİD) kisti, gastrointestinal sistemin nadir görülen bir konjenital anomalisidir. Tüm gastrointestinal sistemde saptanabilen bu anomali en sık ince barsaklarda görülmektedir (%40) (1,2). Özofagus duplikasyon kistleri tüm olguların %20'sini oluşturmaktadır. Özofagus duplikasyon kisti diyafragmatik hiatustan geçip abdomen içine uzanırsa torakoabdominal duplikasyon kisti (TADK) olarak adlandırılmakta ve oldukça nadir görülmektedir (3). Bu çalışmada, TADK tanısı almış ve birbirinden farklı klinik özellikler ile başvuran iki olgunun sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Olgu Sunumları Olgu 1 Yirmi beş yaşındaki annenin üçüncü gebeliğinden ikinci yaşayan olarak 37 haftalık, 3280 gr doğan olgu, intrauterin 8. ayda konjenital diyafragma hernisi tanısı almıştır. Doğum sonrası yapılan radyolojik incelemelerde özofagus Öz ABS TRACT Gastrointestinal duplikasyonlar çocuklarda nadir gözlenen konjenital anomalilerdir. Ağızdan anüse kadar tüm gastrointestinal sistem boyunca görülebilirler. Torakoabdominal varyantları ile oldukça nadir karşılaşılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada birbirinden farklı klinik tablolar ile başvuran iki torako-abdominal duplikasyon kisti olgusunun sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Duplikasyon kisti, konjenital anomaliler, gastrointestinal duplikasyon Gastrointestinal duplications are rare congenital anomalies in children. They may be localized throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus. Thoracoabdominal variants are not usual in this clinical entity. In this study, two cases with thoracoabdominal duplication cysts are presented with different clinical presentations.
Emre Divarcı, Bade Toker, Zafer Dökümcü, Coşkun Özcan, Ata Erdener ABS TRACT Aim: Treatment of congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAMs) consists of different surgical options. In this study, we aimed to report our surgical management strategy according to the location of pulmonary involvement. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for CPAMs between 2005 and 2015. The data including patient demographics, pre-operative clinical features, surgical management strategies and postoperative results were reviewed. Results: Twenty patients (14 male, 6 female) with a median age of 4 months (1 day-12 years) were operated on. Antenatal diagnosis was positive in 12 patients (60%). The other patients were admitted with a median age of 3.5 years (1 day-12 years). Respiratory infection was seen in four patients (20%). Nine patients underwent early operation due to severe dyspnea and recurrent respiratory infection (45%). Lobectomy was performed on 17 patients with single lobe involvement (85%). Lobectomy for major lesion and segmentectomy for minor lesion was performed on two patients with unilateral multi-lobar involvement. One patient with bilateral multi-lobar involvement required multiple thoracoscopic wedge resections. Two patients who had severe dyspnea before surgery required mechanical ventilation after the operation, and one of them died. Two postoperative complications, empyema and pneumothorax were seen. Mean postoperative follow-up period was 5.5 years. Conclusion: CPAMs must be excised totally due to the risk of pulmonary infection and malignancy. The resection strategy should be decided according to the number of the affected lobes. Lobectomy should be performed in single lobar involvement. Unilateral multi-lobar involvement requires lobectomy for a major lesion and segmentectomy for a minor one. Thoracoscopic multiple wedge resections should be the option in bilateral multi-lobar CPAMs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.