Aryl sulfotransferase (AST) activity in rat liver is thought to be a primary pathway in the bio-activation of various hepatocarcinogens to forms which act as ultimate carcinogens in chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. In an effort to understand the significance of rapid and sustained decreases in liver AST that accompany dietary administration of hepatocarcinogens and to further assess its relationship to carcinogenic processes, we determined the abilities of various xenobiotics known to be hepatocarcinogens or non-hepatic carcinogens to lower AST activity. We also determined whether the co-administration of the AST enzyme inhibitor, pentachlorophenol, with hepatocarcinogens will abrogate the lowering of AST activity caused by hepatocarcinogens which do not utilize AST for bio-activation versus hepatocarcinogens which can utilize AST. Among carcinogens tested thus far, we have found the AST activity of liver cytosols to be lowered by the hepatocarcinogens 2-acetylaminofluorene, ethionine, 3'-methyl-4-dimethylaminoazobenzene, thioacetamide, aflatoxin B1, diethylnitrosamine and benzidine, but not by the non-hepatic carcinogens 2-acetylaminophenanthrene or 3-methylcholanthrene. Pentachlorophenol reversed activity losses when co-administered with all carcinogens which lowers AST activity with the exception of ethionine and thioacetamide. We suggest that AST activity lowering is relatively specific for liver carcinogens and involves two different mechanisms.

Rat liver N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-2AAF) sulfotransferase activity is mediated by aryl sulfotransferase IV (AST IV) and causes the bioactivation of N-OH-2AAF to a highly reactive sulfuric acid ester form putatively capable of inducing liver cancer. Dietary administration of 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF) to induce hepatocarcinogenesis in rats has been shown to cause a rapid loss in N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity. A possible mechanism for the in vivo loss in sulfotransferase activity may be the PAPS-dependent, sulfotransferase-catalyzed, reaction product inactivation of the enzyme by covalent reaction with the N-OH-2AAF sulfuric acid ester. In vitro studies to evaluate this possibility utilized a highly purified form of AST IV and measured the extent of PAPS-dependent interaction between the enzyme and N-OH-2[9-14C]AAF. The results showed the presence of a adenosine-3'-phospho-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS)-dependent 14C-labeling of AST IV. The labeling could be blocked if the sulfotransferase inhibitor pentachlorophenol was present. Analysis of 14C-labeled AST IV following alkaline digestion and chromatography of digestion products indicated that AST IV cysteine and methionine residues were primary sites of 2[9-14C]AAF adduction. Studies involving the pretreatment of AST IV with PAPS and N-OH-2AAF prior to the measurement of N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity showed a close parallel between formation of the AST IV cysteine-2AAF adduct and loss of activity. Similar studies showed that enzyme inactivation and cysteine-2AAF adduct formation could be blocked when excessive amounts of a competing nucleophile, methionine, were present during the pretreatment step, suggesting that inactivation does not proceed by a mechanism-based process. Finally, experiments involving prior reaction of AST IV with the thiol-blocking agent, N-ethylmaleimide, before measurement of enzyme activity showed essentially full loss of sulfotransferase activity and suggested that formation of AST IV cysteine-2AAF adducts could be a mechanism for enzyme inactivation. These results indicate that the in vitro inactivation of AST IV by the reactive N-OH-2AAF sulfuric acid ester is accompanied by covalent binding to AST IV, possibly through the formation of cysteine-2AAF adducts, and suggests that this mechanism merits further consideration as a basis for the loss of N-OH-2AAF sulfotransferase activity in vivo.

No abstract

Enzymatic and immunohistochemical experiments were conducted to evaluate the mechanistic basis for the downregulation of the important detoxication/bioactivation enzyme aryl sulfotransferase IV (AST IV) during 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. To distinguish between possible genotoxic and cytotoxic actions of 2AAF, three different dietary protocols were used in these experiments: group 1 received 2AAF for 12 wk, group 2 received 2AAF for 3 or 6 wk and then a control diet lacking xenobiotics for 3 or 6 wk, and group 3 received 2AAF for 3 or 6 wk and then phenobarbital for 3 or 6 wk. When hepatic AST IV activity was assessed, N-hydroxy-2AAF sulfotransferase activity was found to decrease 80-90% in response to 2AAF feeding, but activity recovered to essentially normal levels in the livers of rats subsequently placed on either control diets or diets with phenobarbital, suggesting a reversible cytotoxic mechanism for loss of AST IV activity. However, when liver sections from the rats were evaluated immunohistochemically, two distinct patterns were detected for the downregulation of AST IV activity. In the livers of rats administered only 2AAF (group 1), a general pattern of overall downregulation of AST IV expression was observed throughout the liver and among most but not all newly developed nodules. In tissue sections from rats initially fed 2AAF and then placed on a control diet (group 2) or a diet with phenobarbital (group 3), the nodules continued to show low levels of AST IV expression, while expression in the areas surrounding nodules returned to the normal, high levels. In addition, among those rats fed 2AAF for just 3 wk and then control diet or diet containing phenobarbital for 6 wk, only rats fed phenobarbital developed altered foci that stained weakly for AST IV expression. These results show that there were two kinds of 2AAF-mediated decrease in hepatic AST IV activity: a general overall loss of AST IV expression dependent on administration of 2AAF and reversible upon removal of 2AAF from the diet and a loss of AST IV expression among newly developed liver foci and nodules that persisted in the absence of 2AAF administration and appeared to be a property of 2AAF-induced subpopulations of cells. These patterns may correspond, respectively, to cytotoxic and genotoxic mechanisms of 2AAF action.

No abstract