Localized corpus and dental arch distortions measured directly on human and animal mandibles suggest complex deformation patterns at other mandibular sites during functional loading. To describe these, we simulated selected static bites on a three-dimensional finite element computer model of the human jaw. Five clenching tasks were modeled: intercuspal position, left group function, left group function plus balancing contact, incisal clenching, and right molar clenching. Under conditions of static equilibrium and within the limitations of the current modeling approach, the human jaw deforms elastically during symmetrical and asymmetrical clenching tasks. This deformation is complex, and includes the rotational distortion of the corpora around their axes. In addition, the jaw also deforms parasagittally and transversely. The degree of distortion depended on each clenching task, with actual deformations being relatively small and ranging from 0.46 mm to 1.06 mm for the tasks modeled when all sites were taken into account. The predicted overall narrowing of the dental arch is consistent with clinical reports in the literature during similar, although not identical, static jaw function. The predicted regional deformations of the upper condylar surfaces imply differential loading at their upper surfaces. Although still constrained to forceful static biting conditions, the simulated mandibular and dental arch distortions should be taken into consideration in the design and testing of prosthetic devices in the lower jaw.

The biomechanical events which accompany functional loading of the human mandible are not fully understood. The techniques normally used to record them are highly invasive. Computer modelling offers a promising alternative approach in this regard, with the additional ability to predict regional stresses and strains in inaccessible locations. In this study, we built two three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of a human mandible reconstructed from tomographs of a dry dentate jaw. The first model was used for a complete mechanical characterization of physical events. It also provided comparative data for the second model, which had an increased vertical corpus depth. In both cases, boundary conditions included rigid restraints at the first right molar and endosteal cortical surfaces of the articular eminences of temporal bones. Groups of parallel multiple vectors simulated individual masticatory muscle loads. The models were solved for displacements, stresses, strains, and forces. The simulated muscle loads in the first model deformed the mandible helically upward and toward its right (working) side. The highest principal stresses occurred at the bite point, anterior aspects of the coronoid processes, symphyseal region, and right and left sides of the mandibular corpus. In general, the observed principal stresses and strains were highest on the periosteal cortical surface and alveolar bone. At the symphyseal region, maximum principal stresses and strains were highest on the lower lingual mandibular aspect, whereas minimum principal stresses and strains were highest on its upper labial side. Subcondylar principal strains and condylar forces were higher on the left (balancing or nonbiting) side than on the right mandibular side, with condylar forces more concentrated on the anteromedial aspect of the working-side condyle and on the central and lateral aspects of the left. When compared with in vivo strain data from macaques during comparable biting events, the predictive strain values from the first model were qualitatively similar. In the second model, the reduced tensile stress on the working-side, and decreased shear stress bilaterally, confirmed that lower stresses occurred on the lower mandibular border with increased jaw depth. Our results suggested that although the mandible behaved in a beam-like manner, its corpus acted more like a combination of open and closed cross sections due to the presence of tooth sockets, at least for the task modelled.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In this paper, we provide a review of mechanical finite element analyses applied to the maxillary and/or mandibular bone with their associated natural and restored structures. It includes a description of the principles and the relevant variables involved, and their critical application to published finite element models ranging from three-dimensional reconstructions of the jaws to detailed investigations on the behavior of natural and restored teeth, as well as basic materials science. The survey revealed that many outstanding FE approaches related to natural and restored dental structures had already been done 10-20 years ago. Several three-dimensional mandibular models are currently available, but a more realistic correlation with physiological chewing and biting tasks is needed. Many FE models lack experimentally derived material properties, sensitivity analyses, or validation attempts, and yield too much significance to their predictive, quantitative outcome. A combination of direct validation and, most importantly, the complete assessment of methodical changes in all relevant variables involved in the modeled system probably indicates a good FE modeling approach. A numerical method for addressing mechanical problems is a powerful contemporary research tool. FE analyses can provide precise insight into the complex mechanical behavior of natural and restored craniofacial structures affected by three-dimensional stress fields which are still very difficult to assess otherwise.

The contact area during habitual biting can vary according to the activity of the jaw musculature. Forceful masticatory muscle activity may also induce deformations of the dento-alveolar tissues and the supporting skeleton, yielding various tooth loads despite an apparently even distribution of tooth contacts. To investigate this variability, we measured bite forces simultaneously at multiple dental sites during maximum-effort clenching tasks. In each of four healthy adults with complete natural dentitions, four strain-gauge transducers in the right side of an acrylic maxillary appliance occluded with the lower canine, second premolar, and first and second molars. These, and matching contralateral contacts, were balanced by means of articulating paper and a force monitor (type F appliance). Bite forces were recorded when the subjects, without visual feedback, clenched maximally on the appliance. Similar recordings were made when contralateral molar and all contralateral contacts were removed (type R and type U appliances, respectively). Although the relation between individual forces often changed during the initial increase in force, it was generally constant around the maximum. The maximum forces at the four dental locations varied in distribution between subjects, but were characterized by posteriorly increasing forces. Forces in the anterior region (especially at the canine) significantly increased (up to 10 times) when clenching took place on unilateral contacts only (type U) as compared with fully balanced ones (type F). Bite force distribution thus changed with biting strength and the location of occlusal contacts. Increased force in the canine region during unilateral clenching seems related to the pattern of jaw muscle co-activation and the physical properties of the craniomandibular and dental supporting tissues which induce complex deformations of the lower jaw.

No abstract