No abstract

No abstract

Light field rendering is an image-based rendering method that does not use 3D models but only images of the scene as input to render new views. Light field approximation, represented as a set of images, suffers from so-called refocusing artifacts due to different depth values of the pixels in the scene. Without information about depths in the scene, proper focusing of the light field scene is limited to a single focusing distance. The correct focusing method is addressed in this work and a real-time solution is proposed for focusing of light field scenes, based on statistical analysis of the pixel values contributing to the final image. Unlike existing techniques, this method does not need precomputed or acquired depth information. Memory requirements and streaming bandwidth are reduced and real-time rendering is possible even for high resolution light field data, yielding visually satisfactory results. Experimental evaluation of the proposed method, implemented on a GPU, is presented in this paper.

No abstract

Light field data records the amount of light at multiple points in space, captured e.g. by an array of cameras or by a light-field camera that uses microlenses. Since the storage and transmission requirements for such data are tremendous, compression techniques for light fields are gaining momentum in recent years. Although plenty of efficient compression formats do exist for still and moving images, only a little research on the impact of these methods on light field imagery is performed. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of state-of-the-art image and video compression methods on quality of images rendered from light field data. The methods include recent video compression standards, especially AV1 and XVC finalised in 2018. To fully exploit the potential of common image compression methods on four-dimensional light field imagery, we have extended these methods into three and four dimensions. In this paper, we show that the four-dimensional light field data can be compressed much more than independent still images while maintaining the same visual quality of a perceived picture. We gradually compare the compression performance of all image and video compression methods, and eventually answer the question, "What is the best compression method for light field data?".