Envelope tests are a popular tool in spatial statistics, where they are used
in goodness-of-fit testing. These tests graphically compare an empirical
function $T(r)$ with its simulated counterparts from the null model. However,
the type I error probability $\alpha$ is conventionally controlled for a fixed
distance $r$ only, whereas the functions are inspected on an interval of
distances $I$. In this study, we propose two approaches related to Barnard's
Monte Carlo test for building global envelope tests on $I$:(1) ordering the
empirical and simulated functions based on their $r$-wise ranks among each
other, and (2) the construction of envelopes for a deviation test. These new
tests allow the a priori selection of the global $\alpha$ and they yield
$p$-values. We illustrate these tests using simulated and real point pattern
data
Functional data analysis can be seriously impaired by abnormal observations, which can be classified as either magnitude or shape outliers based on their way of deviating from the bulk of data. Identifying magnitude outliers is relatively easy, while detecting shape outliers is much more challenging. We propose turning the shape outliers into magnitude outliers through data transformation and detecting them using the functional boxplot. Besides easing the detection procedure, applying several transformations sequentially provides a reasonable taxonomy for the flagged outliers. A joint functional ranking, which consists of several transformations, is also defined here. Simulation studies are carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed method using different functional depth notions. Interesting results are obtained in several practical applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.