Recurrent GBM (RGBM) has a highly unfavorable prognosis with majority of patients dying within 6 months and no standard treatments available. Antineoplaston (ANP) A10 and AS2-1 injections underwent Phase II trials in RGBM patients, which reported a long-term overall survival (OS) in a small percentage of patients. The additional Phase II studies BT-07, and BT-21 with ANP in GBM also revealed cases of a long-term OS. ANP shares active ingredients with metabolites of sodium phenylbutyrate (PB), which was used in private practice setting in combination of targeted and chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of RGBM. The treatment contributed to cases of rapid complete response (CR) and significant OS. This paper provides case studies of three patients treated with ANP under Phase II protocols and two patients treated with PB in combination with targeted therapy, who obtained CR and long-term OS. Based on these studies and basic research on the effects of ANP and PB on the genome of GBM and review of results of preclinical and clinical research on targeted agents, the authors suggest a new strategy for successful treatment of RGBM. They propose Phase I/II clinical trials with ANP and PB in combination with targeted agents, bevacizumab (BVZ), pazopanib, dasatinib and everolimus in patients with RGBM after failure of standard surgery, radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy including temozolomide (TMZ) to be conducted to evaluate survival, response and toxicity in these patients.

BackgroundBrainstem gliomas (BSG) are relatively rare tumors of which recurrent pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (RPDIPG) comprise a distinct group. Numerous trials have been conducted on RPDIPG, none of which have resulted in identifying any proven pharmacological treatment benefit. This study included 40 patients diagnosed with different types of BSG, but it was decided to describe first the encouraging results in the most challenging group of RPDIPG.Materials and methodsThis single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 (ANP) in patients with RPDIPG. Seventeen patients (median age 8.8 years) were enrolled, and all were diagnosed with RPDIPG. ANP was administered intravenously daily. Efficacy analyses were conducted in this group of patients.ResultsIn this group, complete responses were observed in 6 % of patients, partial responses in 23.5 %, and stable disease in 11.8 %. Six-month progression-free survival was 35.3 %. One-year overall survival was 29.4 %, 2 years 11.8 %, and 5, 10, and 15 years 5.9 %. One patient with DIPG is alive over 15 years post-treatment. Grade 3 and higher toxicities including hypokalemia and fatigue occurred in 6 %, hypernatremia in 18 %, fatigue and urinary incontinence in 6 %, and somnolence in 12 %. In a single patient, grade 4 hypernatremia occurred when he was on mechanical ventilation. He was disconnected from the ventilator and died from brain tumor according to the attending physician. Responding patients experienced improved quality of life.ConclusionThe results suggest that ANP shows efficacy and acceptable tolerability profile in patients with RPDIPG.

Standard treatment for high-grade glioma involves surgical resection followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide. Unfortunately, there are no standard treatment recommendations after recurrence and new therapies are needed for patients whose tumor recurs after first-line treatment. This single-arm, two-stage, interventional Phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1. Nineteen patients were enrolled in the study (safety population), but fifteen patients with a median age of 9.4 years who met eligibility criteria were evaluated. The majority of subjects (12/15) were Caucasian and 8/15 (53%) were female. More than half (53%) of patients were diagnosed with glioblastoma and 33% with anaplastic astrocytoma. All patients had failed standard therapy including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Antineoplastons were administered intravenously every four hours (median dose of A10 6.9 g/kg/d and AS2-1 0.30 g/kg/d) until objective response was documented and thereafter for a further 8 months. Clinical evaluations were performed every 8 weeks. All patients enrolled in the study were included in the safety analysis but only patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the efficacy evaluation. The duration of treatment with antineoplastons ranged from 2 weeks to 120 weeks. A complete response was documented in 2/15 (13%), partial response in 2/15 (13%), stable disease in 3/15 (20%). Progression-free survival at six months was 47% and overall survival (OS) at one year was 33.3%. One patient (6.7%) survived 10 years from treatment start. A small group of patients suffered reversible Grade 3 and 4 toxicities including hypernatremia 2/19 (11%) and decrease of neutrophils 1/19 (5%). There were no chronic toxicities. There was improvement of quality of life in patients who had objective response. It is concluded that antineoplastons show efficacy with an acceptable profile in this cohort of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

The results of this study compared favourably with the responses of patients treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The study continues with accrual of additional patients.

Pediatric gliosarcoma (GS) is a rare variant of glioblastoma multiforme. The authors describe the case of an unusual pontine location of GS in a 9-year-old boy who was initially diagnosed with low-grade astrocytoma (LGA) that was successfully controlled for 4 years. Subsequently, his brain tumor transformed into a GS. Prior treatment of his LGA included subtotal tumor resection 3 times, standard radiation therapy, and Gamma Knife procedure twice. His LGA was also treated with a standard chemotherapy regimen of carboplatin and vincristine, and his GS with subtotal resection, high-dose cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa with stem cell rescue and temozolomide. Unfortunately, he developed disseminated disease with multiple lesions and leptomeningeal involvement including a tumor occupying 80% of the pons. Upon presentation at our clinic, he had rapidly progressing disease. He received treatment with antineoplastons (ANP) A10 and AS2-1 for 6 years and 10 months under special exception to our phase II protocol BT-22. During his treatment with ANP his tumor stabilized, then decreased, and, ultimately, did not show any metabolic activity. The patient’s response was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scans. His pathology diagnosis was confirmed by external neuropathologists, and his response to the treatment was determined by central radiology review. He experienced the following treatment-related, reversible toxicities with ANP: fatigue, xerostomia and urinary frequency (grade 1), diarrhea, incontinence and urine color change (grade 2), and grade 4 hypernatremia. His condition continued to improve after treatment with ANP and, currently, he complains only of residual neurological deficit from his previous surgery. He achieved a complete response, and his overall and progression-free survival is in excess of 13 years. This report indicates that it is possible to obtain long-term survival of a child with a highly aggressive recurrent GS with diffuse pontine involvement with a currently available investigational treatment.