Aim: This study evaluated the impact of hyperuricemia (HUR) on outcome in patients with different types of impaired renal function (IRF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated invasively. Methods: Out of 3,593 consecutive AMI patients treated invasively, 1,015 IRF patients were selected. The IRF group consisted of patients with baseline kidney dysfunction (BKD group) and/or patients with contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN group). HUR was defined as a serum uric acid concentration (SUAC) >420 µmol/l (>7 mg/dl). Independent predictors of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were selected by the multivariate Cox-regression model. Results: Remote mortality rates were higher in HUR patients: IRF (32.7 vs. 18.6%), BKD (41.3 vs. 25.9%), CIN (35.4 vs. 16.7%); all p < 0.001. HUR was an independent predictor of death in BKD (hazard ratio (HR) 1.38, p < 0.05). Each 100-µmol/l increase in SUAC was associated with a significant increase of HR for mortality: 1.087 in IRF patients, 1.108 in BKD patients, 1.128 in CIN patients; all p < 0.05. Remote major adverse cardiovascular event rates were higher in HUR patients: IRF (55.4 vs. 48.9%), CIN (56.8 vs. 48%); both p < 0.05. Conclusions: In AMI patients treated invasively, an increase in SUAC is an independent predictor of death within all types of renal dysfunction; HUR defined as SUAC >420 µmol/l (>7 mg/dl) is a predictor only in BKD patients.

Despite major therapeutic advances over the last decades, complex supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), particularly in the emergency setting or during revascularization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), remain an important clinical problem. Although the incidence of VAs has declined in the hospital phase of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), mainly due to prompt revascularization and optimal medical therapy, still up to 6% patients with ACS develop ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation within the first hours of ACS symptoms. Despite sustained VAs being perceived predictors of worse in-hospital outcomes, specific associations between the type of VAs, arrhythmia timing, applied treatment strategies and long-term prognosis in AMI are vague. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia that may be asymptomatic and/or may be associated with rapid haemodynamic deterioration requiring immediate treatment. It is estimated that over 20% AMI patients may have a history of AF, whereas the new-onset arrhythmia may occur in 5% patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Importantly, patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI and developed AF have higher rates of adverse events and mortality compared with subjects free of arrhythmia. The scope of this position document is to cover the clinical implications and pharmacological/non-pharmacological management of arrhythmias in emergency presentations and during revascularization. Current evidence for clinical relevance of specific types of VAs complicating AMI in relation to arrhythmia timing has been discussed.

No abstract

Aims  The aim of this study was to determine the contemporary use of reperfusion therapy in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) member and affiliated countries and adherence to ESC clinical practice guidelines in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results  Prospective cohort (EURObservational Research Programme STEMI Registry) of hospitalized STEMI patients with symptom onset &lt;24 h in 196 centres across 29 countries. A total of 11 462 patients were enrolled, for whom primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (total cohort frequency: 72.2%, country frequency range 0–100%), fibrinolysis (18.8%; 0–100%), and no reperfusion therapy (9.0%; 0–75%) were performed. Corresponding in-hospital mortality rates from any cause were 3.1%, 4.4%, and 14.1% and overall mortality was 4.4% (country range 2.5–5.9%). Achievement of quality indicators for reperfusion was reported for 92.7% (region range 84.8–97.5%) for the performance of reperfusion therapy of all patients with STEMI &lt;12 h and 54.4% (region range 37.1–70.1%) for timely reperfusion. Conclusions  The use of reperfusion therapy for STEMI in the ESC member and affiliated countries was high. Primary PCI was the most frequently used treatment and associated total in-hospital mortality was below 5%. However, there was geographic variation in the use of primary PCI, which was associated with differences in in-hospital mortality.

The mortality rate and risk of stroke were strongly associated with the CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Hence, this scoring system could be useful to identify high-risk patients with no history of atrial fibrillation, in whom additional preventive measures might be beneficial to improve the outcome.