Background: Pocket-sized ultrasound devices are used to perform focused ultrasound studies (POCUS). We compared valve malfunction diagnosis rate by cardiac auscultation to POCUS (insonation), both conducted by medical students. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among patients with and without clinically relevant valve dysfunction. Recruitment to the study group was based on the presence of at least one valve pathology of at least moderate severity identified on recent echocardiography study that was required for clinical reasons. Three final-year medical students examined the patients. Each patient underwent auscultation and a POCUS using a pocket-sized ultrasound machine. Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of patients correctly identified as having a valve disorder. Specificity was defined as correct identification of the absence of valve pathology. Results: The study included 56 patients. In 18 (32%), no valve pathology was found. Nineteen patients (34%) had at least two valvular pathologies. Sixty valve lesions were present in the whole cohort. Students' sensitivity for detecting any valve lesion was 32% and 64% for auscultation and insonation; respectively, specificity was similar.   The sensitivity for diagnosing mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, and aortic regurgitation rose significantly by using POCUS compared to auscultation alone. When using POCUS, Students identified valve pathologies in 22 cases (39%) from the patients with at least two valve dysfunctions, and none when using auscultation. Conclusions: Final-year medical students' competency to detect valve dysfunction by performing cardiac auscultation is poor. Cardiac ultrasound-focused training significantly improved medical students' sensitivity for diagnosing a variety of valve pathologies.

No abstract