In our experience, a careful pre-operative evaluation has yielded good surgical results even in older patients with different comorbidities. Associated coronary grafts slightly increase the surgical risk. The role of revascularization on long-term morbidity and mortality is still not clear. It is essential to compare the results of percutaneous and trans-apical aortic valve replacement with the literature results of conventional aortic valve replacement with and without CABG before it can be used as an alternative for very older patients.

No abstract

Background: Median sternotomy is still the approach of choice for heart surgery and the most common sternal closure is conventional six-wire technique. Mediastinitis is the frightening complication of the median sternotomy and occurs from 1% up to 2.4% of cases with a mortality rate which ranges from 14% up to 47%. Many methods have been suggested to reinforce the sternum with the common goal to improve sternal stability and prevent mediastinitis, but there is not consensus among cardiac surgeons on the optimal way to close the sternum. For this reason, we report our experience with a sternal device that, although not entirely new as a concept, has new technical features and plays a new role in preventing sternal dehiscence, according to the most recent findings on mechanism which leads to sternal dehiscence. Methods:We enrolled 62 high risk patients for sternal dehiscence (patients with 2 well established historical risk factors), and we closed the sternum of the patients with a new surgical option consisting of passing, in a conventional six-wire sternal closure, the last sixth steel wire (Ø 1.0 mm, n° 5) through a couple of titanium cannulated screws (Ø 5.5 mm, self-tap-ping with a length from 10 to 16 mm and 2-mm increments) inserted into the 5th or 6th couple of rib cartilages. Results: Primary chest closure with cannulated screws was performed on 48 males and 14 females. The average age of patients was 67.6 years (range, 43-88 years). The average follow-up was 12.8±16.2 months (range, 1-41 months). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the most common preoperative risk factor. The average number of risk factors was 2.4 (range, 2-4). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the most common cardiac procedure. There were no peri-operative deaths. BMI >30 Kg/m 2 and diabetes were the associated of risk factors predisposing to superficial skin dehiscence.Conclusions: In our clinical experience with high risk patients, this surgical option suggests that there is evidence of an effective stabilization of standard sternal closure and this option seems a promising technique to prevent the domino effect which starts from the xifoid bone and proceeds to the manubrium with the effect of leading to sternal instability which is the first step to mediastinitis.

In the last years the population of patients referred for coronary surgery has changed toward a high-risk profile. In selected cases minimally invasive approach could be a good option to reduce mortality and morbidity. Between September 2005 and September 2007, twenty-one consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive bypass surgery using the J-shaped inferior mini-sternotomy approach. All patients had a EuroSCORE higher than 6. The operative mortality was 0%. Conversion to on-pump surgery was not necessary. The mean operation time was 89+/-18 min, the mean ventilation time was 2.4+/-2.2 h, the mean intensive care unit stay was 47.2+/-36.5 h. In four patients a hybrid approach to achieve a complete revascularization was used. After six months from the operation the graft patency was evaluated with the 64-slice computed tomography. In high-risk coronary patients the use of the minimally invasive technique appeared a good option to achieve low morbidity and mortality. Through a mini-sternotomy approach, single- or double-vessel revascularization can be performed safely off-pump even in high-risk patients without compromising the accuracy of the anastomosis. Nevertheless, a further investigation is required to evaluate the long-term results in a larger cohort of patients.

No abstract