Link Prediction (LP) aims at tackling Knowledge Graph incompleteness by inferring new, missing facts from the already known ones. The rise of novel Machine Learning techniques has led researchers to develop LP models that represent Knowledge Graph elements as vectors in an embedding space. These models can outperform traditional approaches and they can be employed in multiple downstream tasks; nonetheless, they tend to be opaque, and are mostly regarded as black boxes. Their lack of interpretability limits our understanding of their inner mechanisms, and undermines the trust that users can place in them. In this paper, we propose the novel Kelpie explainability framework. Kelpie can be applied to any embedding-based LP models independently from their architecture, and it explains predictions by identifying the combinations of training facts that have enabled them. Kelpie can extract two complementary types of explanations, that we dub necessary and sufficient. We describe in detail both the structure and the implementation details of Kelpie, and thoroughly analyze its performance through extensive experiments. Our results show that Kelpie significantly outperforms baselines across almost all scenarios.

Entity resolution (ER) aims at matching records that refer to the same real-world entity. Although widely studied for the last 50 years, ER still represents a challenging data management problem, and several recent works have started to investigate the opportunity of applying deep learning (DL) techniques to solve this problem. In this paper, we study the fundamental problem of explainability of the DL solution for ER. Understanding the matching predictions of an ER solution is indeed crucial to assess the trustworthiness of the DL model and to discover its biases. We treat the DL model as a black box classifier and -while previous approaches to provide explanations for DL predictions are agnostic to the classification task -we propose the CERTA approach that is aware of the semantics of the ER problem. Our approach produces both saliency explanations, which associate each attribute with a saliency score, and counterfactual explanations, which provide examples of values that can flip the prediction. CERTA builds on a probabilistic framework that aims at computing the explanations evaluating the outcomes produced by using perturbed copies of the input records. We experimentally evaluate CERTA's explanations of state-of-the-art ER solutions based on DL models using publicly available datasets, and demonstrate the effectiveness of CERTA over recently proposed methods for this problem.

Entity resolution (ER) aims at identifying record pairs that refer to the same real-world entity. Recent works have focused on deep learning (DL) techniques, to solve this problem. While such works have brought tremendous enhancements in terms of effectiveness in solving the ER problem, understanding their matching predictions is still a challenge, because of the intrinsic opaqueness of DL based solutions. Interpreting and trusting the predictions made by ER systems is crucial for humans in order to employ such methods in decision making pipelines. We demonstrate CERTEM an explanation system for ER based on CERTA, a recently introduced explainability framework for ER, that is able to provide both saliency explanations, which associate each attribute with a saliency score, and counterfactual explanations, which provide examples of values that can flip a prediction. In this demonstration we will showcase how CERTEM can be effectively employed to better understand and debug the behavior of state-of-the-art DL based ER systems on data from publicly available ER benchmarks.

The latest generations of Link Prediction (LP) models rely on embeddings to tackle incompleteness in Knowledge Graphs, achieving great performance at the cost of interpretability. Their opaqueness limits the trust that users can place in them, hindering their adoption in real-world applications. We have recently introduced Kelpie, an explainability framework tailored specifically for embedding-based LP models. Kelpie can be applied to any embedding-based LP model, and supports two explanation scenarios that we have called necessary and sufficient. In this demonstration we showcase Kelpie's capability to explain the predictions of models based on vastly different architectures on the 5 major datasets in literature.