Purpose: Aggressive cell growth and chemoresistance are notorious obstacles in melanoma therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that survivin is preferentially expressed in cancer cells and plays a crucial role in cell division and apoptosis dysfunction. Here, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of YM155, a selective survivin suppressant, alone and in combination with docetaxel using human melanoma models.Experimental Design: A375 and SK-MEL-5 human malignant melanoma cells were treated with siRNA, YM155, and/or docetaxel, and cell viability, mRNA and protein expression levels, cell-cycle distribution, and immunohistochemical staining were then evaluated. Furthermore, the efficacy of YM155 combined with docetaxel was further examined in established xenograft models.Results: Survivin suppression was sufficient to induce spontaneous apoptosis of melanoma cells. YM155 showed nanomolar antiproliferative effects and induced tumor regression in established melanoma xenograft models. Docetaxel showed antitumor activity against melanoma cells, although it also induced survivin upregulation and G 2 /M mitotic arrest; however, cotreatment with YM155 decreased survivin expression below basal levels. Combination treatment of YM155 and docetaxel induced a greater rate of apoptosis than the sum of the single-treatment rates and promoted tumor regression without enhanced body weight loss in the melanoma xenograft models.Conclusions: Survivin is responsible for the inherent low levels of spontaneous apoptosis in melanoma cells. The concomitant combination of YM155 with docetaxel diminished the accumulation of survivin in G 2 /M mitotic arrest, and induced more intense apoptosis compared with each single treatment. YM155 in combination with docetaxel is well tolerated and shows greater efficacy than either agent alone in mouse xenograft models.

B-Myb is one member of the vertebrate Myb family of transcription factors and is ubiquitously expressed. B-Myb activates transcription of a group of genes required for the G2/M cell cycle transition by forming the dREAM/Myb-MuvB-like complex, which was originally identified in Drosophila. Mutants of zebrafish B-myb and Drosophila myb exhibit defects in cell cycle progression and genome instability. Although the genome instability caused by a loss of B-Myb has been speculated to be due to abnormal cell cycle progression, the precise mechanism remains unknown. Here, we have purified a B-Myb complex containing clathrin and filamin (Myb-Clafi complex). This complex is required for normal localization of clathrin at the mitotic spindle, which was previously reported to stabilize kinetochore fibres. The Myb-Clafi complex is not tightly associated with the mitotic spindles, suggesting that this complex ferries clathrin to the mitotic spindles. Thus, identification of the Myb-Clafi complex reveals a previously unrecognized function of B-Myb that may contribute to its role in chromosome stability, possibly, tumour suppression.

Myb‐binding protein 1a (Mybbp1a) was originally identified as a c‐myb proto‐oncogene product (c‐Myb)‐interacting protein, and also binds to various other transcription factors. The 160‐kDa Mybbp1a protein (p160MBP) is ubiquitously expressed and is post‐translationally processed in some types of cells to generate an amino‐terminal 67 kDa fragment (p67MBP). Despite its interaction with various transcription factors, Mybbp1a is localized predominantly, but not exclusively, in nucleoli. Here, we have purified the two Mybbp1a‐containing complexes. The smaller complex contained p67MBP and p140MBP, which lacked the C‐terminal region of p160MBP containing the nucleolar localization sequences. The larger complex contained the intact p160MBP and various ribosomal subunits. Treatment of cells with actinomycin D (ActD), cisplatin or UV, all of which inhibit ribosome biogenesis, induced processing of p160MBP into p140MBP and p67MBP. ActD, cisplatin and UV also induced a translocation of Mybbp1a from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Both small and large Mybbp1a complexes contained nucleophosmin and nucleolin. In contrast, nucleostemin was detected only in the large complex, while the cell cycle‐regulated protein EBP1 was only in the small complex. These results suggest that Mybbp1a may connect the ribosome biogenesis and the Myb‐dependent transcription, which controls cell cycle progression and proliferation.

No abstract

Survivin is responsible for cancer progression and drug resistance in many types of cancer. YM155 selectively suppresses the expression of survivin and induces apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism underlying these effects of YM155 is unknown. Here, we show that a transcription factor, interleukin enhancer-binding factor 3 (ILF3)/NF110, is a direct binding target of YM155. The enhanced survivin promoter activity by overexpression of ILF3/NF110 was attenuated by YM155 in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that ILF3/NF110 is the physiological target through which YM155 mediates survivin suppression. The results also show that the unique C-terminal region of ILF3/NF110 is important for promoting survivin expression and for high affinity binding to YM155.