Background/Aim: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as indomethacin produce damage in the small intestine as a major adverse reaction. We examined the effect of various NSAIDs on intestinal motility and investigated the pathogenic importance of motility changes in the intestinal ulcerogenic response to indomethacin in rats. Methods: Animals without fasting were given various NSAIDs (indomethacin 10 mg/kg, diclofenac 40 mg/kg, flurbiprofen 20 mg/kg, naproxen 40 mg/kg) s.c., and in the case of indomethacin, the following parameters were examined in the small intestine 24 h later; the lesion score, the number of enterobacteria and myeloperoxidase (MPO) as well as inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) activity. Intestinal motility was monitored as intraluminal pressure recordings using a balloon under anesthesia. Results: All NSAIDs tested decreased mucosal PGE2 levels and produced hemorrhagic lesions in the small intestine, accompanied by intestinal hypermotility. As representative of NSAIDs, indomethacin also increased the extent of enterobacterial invasion and MPO as well as iNOS activity before the occurrence of intestinal damage, and the hypermotility response was observed earlier than the onset of any other event caused by this agent. The intestinal lesions induced by indomethacin were prevented by either supplementation with dmPGE2, inhibition of bacterial invasion with ampicillin or inhibition of iNOS activity with aminoguanidine, while the hypermotility response was prevented by dmPGE2 only. In addition, the observed effects of dmPGE2 were all mimicked by atropine when the intestinal hypermotility was suppressed by this agent. Conclusion: These results suggest the pathogenic importance of intestinal hypermotility in the intestinal ulcerogenic response to NSAIDs in rats and show that this event is critical for the occurrence of enterobacterial invasion under PG deficiency, followed by various inflammatory changes and damage in the mucosa. This study also suggests that the antispasmodic drug is protective against NSAID-induced intestinal lesions.
Background/Aim: We examined the prophylactic effect of lafutidine, a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist [(±)-2-(furfurylsulfinyl)-N-[4-[4-(piperidinomethyl)-2-pyridyl]oxy-(Z)-2 butenyl]acetamide], on indomethacin-induced small intestinal ulcers in rats and investigated the relation of this action to capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. Methods and Results: Subcutaneously administered indomethacin (10 mg/kg) provoked ulceration in the small intestine, mainly the jejunum and ileum, accompanied by increases in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activities as well as the enterobacterial numbers invading the mucosa. Intestinal ulcerogenic response to indomethacin was prevented by 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (10 μg/kg, p.o.) and capsaicin (10 mg/kg, p.o.) as well as ampicillin (800 mg/kg, p.o.), but not omeprazole (100 mg/kg, p.o.). Likewise, lafutidine (1–10 mg/kg, p.o.), but not cimetidine (100 mg/kg, p.o.), reduced the occurrence of intestinal ulcers in response to indomethacin in a dose-dependent manner, and a significant effect was observed at 3 mg/kg or greater. The protective action of lafutidine as well as capsaicin was almost totally abolished by chemical ablation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. Both lafutidine and capsaicin significantly suppressed the increases in MPO and iNOS activities as well as enterobacterial numbers in the mucosa. These agents also significantly enhanced mucus secretion in the small intestine. Conclusion: These results suggest that lafutidine protects the small intestine against ulceration via stimulation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. This action may be attributable to inhibition of enterobacterial invasion in the intestinal mucosa, probably by increasing the mucus secretion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.