Missense mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) cause late-onset Parkinson disease, and common genetic variation in LRRK2 modifies susceptibility to Crohn disease and leprosy. High levels of LRRK2 expression in peripheral monocytes and macrophages suggest a role for LRRK2 in these cells, yet little is known about LRRK2 expression and function in immune cells of the brain. Here, we demonstrate a role for LRRK2 in mediating microglial pro-inflammatory responses and morphology. In a murine model of neuroinflammation, we observe robust induction of LRRK2 in microglia. Experiments with TLR4-stimulated rat primary microglia show that inflammation increases LRRK2 activity and expression while inhibition of LRRK2 kinase activity or knockdown of protein attenuates TNFα secretion and iNOS induction. LRRK2 inhibition blocks TLR4 stimulated microglial process outgrowth and impairs ADP stimulated microglial chemotaxis. However, actin inhibitors that phenocopy inhibition of process outgrowth and chemotaxis fail to modify TLR4 stimulation of TNFα secretion and iNOS induction, suggesting LRRK2 acts upstream of cytoskeleton control as a stress-responsive kinase. These data demonstrate LRRK2 in regulating responses in immune cells of the brain and further implicate microglial involvement in late-onset PD.
cAMP, the classical second messenger, regulates many diverse cellular functions. The primary effector of cAMP signals, protein kinase A, differentially phosphorylates hundreds of cellular targets. Little is known, however, about the spatial and temporal nature of cAMP signals and their information content. Thus, it is largely unclear how cAMP, in response to different stimuli, orchestrates such a wide variety of cellular responses. Previously, we presented evidence that cAMP is produced in subcellular compartments near the plasma membrane, and that diffusion of cAMP from these compartments to the bulk cytosol is hindered. Here we report that a uniform extracellular stimulus initiates distinct cAMP signals within different cellular compartments. By using cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels engineered as cAMP biosensors, we found that prostaglandin E 1 stimulation of human embryonic kidney cells caused a transient increase in cAMP concentration near the membrane. Interestingly, in the same time frame, the total cellular cAMP rose to a steady level. The decline in cAMP levels near the membrane was prevented by pretreatment with phosphodiesterase inhibitors. These data demonstrate that spatially and temporally distinct cAMP signals can coexist within simple cells.
Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) catalyze the hydrolysis of the second messengers cAMP and cGMP. However, little is known about how PDE activity regulates cyclic nucleotide signals in vivo because, outside of specialized cells, there are few methods with the appropriate spatial and temporal resolution to measure cyclic nucleotide concentrations. We have previously demonstrated that adenovirus-expressed, olfactory cyclic nucleotide–gated channels provide real-time sensors for cAMP produced in subcellular compartments of restricted diffusion near the plasma membrane (Rich, T.C., K.A. Fagan, H. Nakata, J. Schaack, D.M.F. Cooper, and J.W. Karpen. 2000. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:147–161). To increase the utility of this method, we have modified the channel, increasing both its cAMP sensitivity and specificity, as well as removing regulation by Ca2+-calmodulin. We verified the increased sensitivity of these constructs in excised membrane patches, and in vivo by monitoring cAMP-induced Ca2+ influx through the channels in cell populations. The improved cAMP sensors were used to monitor changes in local cAMP concentration induced by adenylyl cyclase activators in the presence and absence of PDE inhibitors. This approach allowed us to identify localized PDE types in both nonexcitable HEK-293 and excitable GH4C1 cells. We have also developed a quantitative framework for estimating the KI of PDE inhibitors in vivo. The results indicate that PDE type IV regulates local cAMP levels in HEK-293 cells. In GH4C1 cells, inhibitors specific to PDE types I and IV increased local cAMP levels. The results suggest that in these cells PDE type IV has a high K m for cAMP, whereas PDE type I has a low K m for cAMP. Furthermore, in GH4C1 cells, basal adenylyl cyclase activity was readily observable after application of PDE type I inhibitors, indicating that there is a constant synthesis and hydrolysis of cAMP in subcellular compartments near the plasma membrane. Modulation of constitutively active adenylyl cyclase and PDE would allow for rapid control of cAMP-regulated processes such as cellular excitability.
Successful islet transplantation depends on the infusion of sufficiently large quantities of islets, but only a fraction of transplanted islets can survive and become engrafted, and yet the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we examined the effect of sirolimus, a key component of the immunosuppressive regimen in clinical islet transplantation, on islet engraftment and function. To distinguish the effect of sirolimus on immune rejection from its effect on islet engraftment, we used a syngeneic model. Diabetic mice were transplanted with 250 islets under the renal capsule, followed by treatment with sirolimus or vehicle for 14 days. Thirty days posttransplantation, islet grafts were retrieved for the determination of insulin content and vascular density. Compared with mocktreated controls, diabetic recipient mice receiving sirolimus exhibited impaired blood glucose profiles and reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, correlating with reduced intragraft insulin content and decreased vascular density. Islets exposed to sirolimus for 24 h in culture displayed significantly diminished glucose-stimulated insulin release, coinciding with decreased pancreas duodenum homeobox-1 and GLUT2 expression in cultured islets. Furthermore, sirolimus-treated diabetic recipient mice, as opposed to mock-treated controls, were associated with dyslipidemia. These data suggest that sirolimus, administered in the early posttransplantation phase, is a confounding factor for reduced islet engraftment and impaired -cell function in transplants. Diabetes 55:2429 -2436, 2006 T he Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation depends on the infusion of ϳ10,000 IE (islet equivalents)/kg body wt, requiring multiple cadaver pancreata per diabetic recipient (1-4). Despite the implantation of such a large quantity of islets, Ͻ30% of transplanted islets can survive the procedure and gain stable engraftment, and yet the mechanism underlying the loss of a vast majority of islet mass in the early posttransplantation phase remains elusive (4,5). Unlike whole-organ transplantation, by which grafts are implanted as vascularized tissue, islets are transplanted as single islets or islet clusters that are considered avascular following collagenase digestion and isolation. Although residual endothelial cells in isolated islets may contribute to islet revascularization (6,7), adequate intraislet blood flow requires the formation of a functional microvascular network that links engrafted islets to surrounding tissues. These data suggest that microvascular perfusion to newly transplanted islets does not resume immediately after transplantation and can take up to 2 weeks before the reestablishment of a functional microvasculature in islet grafts (8,9). This delay in islet revascularization can potentially deprive islets of oxygen and nutrients, resulting in islet cell death, particularly within the core of engrafted islets. There is mounting evidence that impaired islet revascularization is an independent factor that limits the success rate...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.