This study found that STN stimulation produced significant improvement of overall pain related to PD in patients with advanced PD, and the efficacy continued for at least 1 year. The present results indicate that musculoskeletal pain and dystonic pain responded well to STN stimulation, but patients with back pain (somatic pain) and radicular/peripheral neuropathic pain originating from spinal disease have a potential risk for postoperative deterioration of their pain.

No abstract

Recent studies have indicated the importance of subcortical mapping of the corticospinal tract (CT) during tumor resection close to the primary motor area. It is substantial evidence that the corticospinal descending direct wave (D-wave) can be used as a guide for mapping of the primary motor cortex (M1) and for monitoring of the CT functional integrity. In the present study, the authors investigated the feasibility of D-wave recordings after subcortical stimulation. The authors examined 14 patients with brain tumors close to the M1 and/or CT, who exhibited no obvious motor deficit before surgery. Subcortical white matter was electrically stimulated in monopolar or bipolar fashion by recording the descending wave (D-wave) from the spinal epidural space using a catheter-type electrode. Subcortical D-wave was more clearly recorded after monopolar stimulation than after bipolar stimulation. The features of the subcortical D-wave, including its waveform, conduction velocity, and latency, were nearly identical to those of the corticospinal D-wave recorded after M1 stimulation. Subcortical D-wave amplitude was prone to change depending on the distance from the stimulation points to the CT. Changes in parameters of subcortical D-wave may provide valuable information to prevent postoperative motor deficit. Further studies are required to clarify the relationship between the distance from the stimulating point to the CT and the amplitude of the subcortically elicited D-wave.

Background: Perinatal anoxia rarely causes myoclonus as the main neurologic abnormality. The exact neuronal mechanism underlying myoclonus induced by perinatal anoxia remains unknown. Some studies have indicated that the development of involuntary movements may be related to the maturation of the thalamus after birth. Objectives and Methods: Here, we describe the first case of a patient who developed action myoclonus after experiencing perinatal anoxia and was successfully treated by chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus (thalamic DBS). Results andConclusion: The effectiveness of chronic thalamic DBS in this patient supports the concept of involvement of the thalamus in postperinatal anoxic myoclonus.

Objective: The development of image-guided systems rendered it possible to perform frameless stereotactic surgery for deep brain stimulation (DBS). As well as stereotactic targeting, neurophysiological identification of the target is important. Multitract microrecording is an effective technique to identify the best placement of an electrode. This is a report of our experience of using the Nexframe frameless stereotaxy with Ben’s Gun multitract microrecording drive and our study of the accuracy, usefulness and disadvantages of the system. Methods: Five patients scheduled to undergo bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS were examined. The Nexframe device was adjusted to the planned target, and electrodes were introduced using a microdrive for multitract microrecording. In addition to the Nexframe frameless system, we adopted the Leksell G frame to the same patients simultaneously to use a stereotactic X-ray system. This system consisted of a movable X-ray camera with a crossbar and was adopted to be always parallel to the frame with the X-ray film cassette. The distance between the expected and actual DBS electrode placements was measured on such a stereotactic X-ray system. In addition, the distance measured with this system was compared with that measured by conventional frame-based stereotaxy in 20 patients (40 sides). Results: The mean deviations from 10 planned targets were 1.3 ± 0.3 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, 1.0 ± 0.9 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction and 0.5 ± 0.6 mm in the superoposterior (z) direction. The data from the frame-based stereotaxy in our institute were 1.5 ± 0.9 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, 1.1 ± 0.7 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm in the superoposterior (z) direction. Then, differences were not statistically significant in any direction (p > 0.05). The multitract microrecording procedure associated with the Nexframe was performed without any problems in all of the patients. None of these electrodes migrated during and/or after the surgery. However, the disadvantage of the system is the narrow surgical field for multiple electrode insertion. Coagulating the cortex and inserting multiple electrodes under such a narrow visual field were complicated. Conclusion: The Nexframe with multitract microrecording for STN DBS still has some problems that need to be resolved. Thus far, we do not consider that this technology in its present state can replace conventional frame-based stereotactic surgery. The accuracy of the system is similar to that of frame-based stereotaxy. However, the narrow surgical field is a disadvantage for multiple electrode insertion. Improvement on this point will enhance the usefulness of the system.