The application of bacteriophages (phages) in therapy urgently requires the production of wide-host-range recombinant phages that possess strong lytic activity. The wide-host-range IP008 phage was classified by transmission electron microscopy analysis as an A2 morphotype member of the Myoviridae family of the order Caudovirales. IP008 showed a high homology (99.4% similarity in the amino acid alignment of the major capsid protein Gp 23) with KEP10, another wide-host-range phage. The long tail fiber genes (genes 37 and 38) from the genome of T2 were replaced with those of the IP008 phage by homologous recombination. The host range of the recombinant phages was identical to that of IP008. Furthermore, the recombinant phage bacterial lytic activity was restored. Future analyses of host-range mutants of the closely related phages T2 and IP008 could lead to a more precise localization of the genetic factors responsible for receptor specificity.

Interaction between the iron transporter protein transferrin (Tf) and its receptor at the cell surface is fundamental for most living organisms. Tf receptor (TfR) binds iron-loaded Tf (holo-Tf) and transports it to endosomes, where acidic pH favors iron release. Iron-free Tf (apo-Tf) is then brought back to the cell surface and dissociates from TfR. Here we investigated the Tf-TfR interaction at the single-molecule level under different conditions encountered during the Tf cycle. An atomic force microscope tip functionalized with holo-Tf or apo-Tf was used to probe TfR. We tested both purified TfR anchored to a mica substrate and in situ TfR at the surface of living cells. Dynamic force measurements showed similar results for TfR on mica or at the cell surface but revealed striking differences between holo-Tf-TfR and apo-Tf-TfR interactions. First, the forces necessary to unbind holo-Tf and TfR are always stronger compared to the apo-Tf-TfR interaction. Second, dissociation of holo-Tf-TfR complex involves overcoming two energy barriers, whereas the apo-Tf-TfR unbinding pathway comprises only one energy barrier. These results agree with a model that proposes differences in the contact points between holo-Tf-TfR and apo-Tf-TfR interactions.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract