In conclusion the 'spray as you go' technique was safe, provided effective local anaesthesia and was preferred by both patients and endoscopists.

Pain after arthroscopy is quite distressing. Intra-articular bupivacaine produces transient analgesia and reports of analgesia using intra-articular opioids have produced conflicting results. Recently, spinal administration of neostigmine was shown to produce dose-dependant analgesia. However, this was limited by adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects on intra-articular neostigmine, bupivacaine and morphine. 75 patients were randomized to receive intra-articular saline, bupivacaine, morphine, neostigmine and bupivacaine-neostigmine after arthroscopic surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Visual analog pain scores (VAS), duration of analgesia as defined as time for first demand for parenteral opioids and the total subsequent consumption of morphine was evaluated. Intra-articular bupivacaine resulted in significant VAS reduction at one and four hours as compared to those receiving intra-articular saline and morphine. Analgesia lasted longer after 500ugm intra-articular neostigmine as compared with bupivacaine, morphine or saline. The need for supplementary analgesia was lowest in the neostigmine group as compared to the other groups. No significant difference was found if bupivacaine was added to neostigmine. Among all the groups, no significant side-effects were observed. MJAFI 2004; 60 : 123-127