Therapeutic antibodies directed against the type 1 insulinlike growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) have recently gained significant momentum in the clinic because of preliminary data generated in human patients with cancer. These antibodies inhibit ligand-mediated activation of IGF-1R and the resulting downstream signaling cascade. Here we generated a panel of antibodies against IGF-1R and screened them for their ability to block the binding of both IGF-1 and IGF-2 at escalating ligand concentrations (>1 M) to investigate allosteric versus competitive blocking mechanisms. Four distinct inhibitory classes were found as follows: 1) allosteric IGF-1 blockers, 2) allosteric IGF-2 blockers, 3) allosteric IGF-1 and IGF-2 blockers, and 4) competitive IGF-1 and IGF-2 blockers. The epitopes of representative antibodies from each of these classes were mapped using a purified IGF-1R library containing 64 mutations. Most of these antibodies bound overlapping surfaces on the cysteine-rich repeat and L2 domains. One class of allosteric IGF-1 and IGF-2 blocker was identified that bound a separate epitope on the outer surface of the FnIII-1 domain. Using various biophysical techniques, we show that the dual IGF blockers inhibit ligand binding using a spectrum of mechanisms ranging from highly allosteric to purely competitive. Binding of IGF-1 or the inhibitory antibodies was associated with conformational changes in IGF-1R, linked to the ordering of dynamic or unstructured regions of the receptor. These results suggest IGF-1R uses disorder/order within its polypeptide sequence to regulate its activity. Interestingly, the activity of representative allosteric and competitive inhibitors on H322M tumor cell growth in vitro was reflective of their individual ligand-blocking properties. Many of the antibodies in the clinic likely adopt one of the inhibitory mechanisms described here, and the outcome of future clinical studies may reveal whether a particular inhibitory mechanism leads to optimal clinical efficacy. The type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R)2 is a large transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase expressed on most somatic cells. IGF-1R is activated by the binding of its constitutive ligands, IGF-1 and IGF-2 (and at a much lower affinity, insulin). Ligand binding to the IGF-1R extracellular domains leads to activation of its cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain, receptor autophosphorylation, and phosphorylation of downstream targets such as insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), the Src homology and collagen domain protein (Shc), and others (1, 2). Phosphorylation of IRS-1 activates the phosphoinositol kinase 3/AKT cellular growth and survival pathways, and Shc phosphorylation leads to the activation of other signal cascades, including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase(Erk)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cellular growth and proliferation pathways (3).Human IGF-1R is synthesized as a 1368-amino acid polypeptide whose primary and tertiary structures have been reviewed (4,5). The N-terminal region (consis...

To gain insight on the significance of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) indeterminate serological reactivities, we studied villagers of South Cameroon, focusing on a frequent and specific HTLV-1 Gag indeterminate profile (HGIP) pattern (gag p19, p26, p28, and p30 without p24 or Env gp21 and gp46). Among the 102 sera studied, 29 from all age groups had a stable HGIP pattern over a period of 4 years. There was no epidemiological evidence for sexual or vertical transmission of HGIP. Seventy-five percent of HGIP sera reacted positively on MT2 HTLV-1-infected cells by immunofluorescence assay. However, we could not isolate any HTLV-1 virus or detect the presence of p19 Gag protein in cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from individuals with strong HGIP reactivity. PCR experiments conducted with primers for HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 (HTLV-1/2 primers) encompassing different regions of the virus did not yield HTLV-1/2 proviral sequences from individuals with HGIP. Using 11 peptides corresponding to HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 immunodominant B epitopes in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, one epitope corresponding to the Gag p19 carboxyl terminus was identified in 75% of HGIP sera, while it was recognized by only 41% of confirmed HTLV-1-positive sera. A positive correlation between HTLV-1 optical density values and titers of antibody to Plasmodium falciparum was also demonstrated. Finally, passage of sera through a P. falciparum-infected erythrocyte-coupled column was shown to specifically abrogate HGIP reactivity but not the HTLV-1 pattern, suggesting the existence of cross-reactivity between HTLV-1 Gag proteins and malaria-derived antigens. These data suggest that in Central Africa, this frequent and specific Western blot is not caused by HTLV-1 infection but could instead be associated with P. falciparum infection.

Galiximab is a primatized monoclonal antibody that targets CD80 expressed on malignant B cells and is being studied in the clinic as a potential treatment for follicular NHL. We have recently reported that galiximab signals B-NHL cells in vitro and inhibits cell growth and sensitizes resistant tumor cells to apoptosis by chemotherapeutic drugs. This study was designed to validate the in vitro findings in in vivo in mice. Thus, we examined in vivo the antitumor activity of galiximab used alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in SCID mice bearing human lymphoma xenografts. The in vivo antitumor effects of galiximab used alone and in combination with fludarabine or doxorubicin were determined in solid and disseminated human B-lymphoma tumors grown in SCID mice. Galiximab monotherapy in vivo demonstrated significant antitumor activity in a Raji lymphoma solid tumor model and in an SKW disseminated lymphoma tumor model. There was significant inhibition in tumor growth and prolongation of survival. In vitro, galiximab sensitized Raji cells to apoptosis by both fludarabine and doxorubicin. Tumor growth inhibition was significantly enhanced when the mice were treated with the combination of galiximab and fludarabine. These findings support the potential clinical application of galiximab in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of CD80-expressing hematological malignancies.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients receiving in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD) are highly vulnerable to COVID-19. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We created a quality improvement (QI) project aimed to eliminate outbreaks of COVID-19 in haemodialysis units and evaluated the utility of surveillance rRT-PCR test and SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies for prompt identification of patients infected with COVID-19. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A multifaceted QI programme including a bundle of infection prevention control (IPC) measures was implemented across 5 ICHD units following the first wave of the pandemic in June 2020. Primary outcomes evaluated before and after QI implementation were incidence of outbreaks and severe COVID-19 illness defined as COVID-19-related death or hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients identified in the pre-symptomatic/asymptomatic phase on surveillance rRT-PCR screening and the incidence and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Following the implementation of the QI project, there were no further outbreaks. Pre- and post-implementation comparison showed a significant reduction in COVID-19-related mortality and hospitalization (26 vs. 13 events, respectively, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Surveillance rRT-PCR screening identified 39 asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic cases out of a total of 59 rRT-PCR-positive patients (39/59, 66%). SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were detected in 72/74 (97%) rRT-PCR-positive patients. Amongst rRT-PCR-positive patients diagnosed before August 2020, 96% had detectable antibodies until January 2021 (days from the rRT-PCR test to last antibody testing, 245–280). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Systematic implementation of a bundle of IPC measures using QI methodology and surveillance rRT-PCR eliminated outbreaks in HD facilities. Most HD patients mount and sustain antibody response to COVID-19 for over 8 months.

No abstract