This paper employs syndemics theory to explain high rates of sexually transmitted disease among inner city African American and Puerto Rican heterosexual young adults in Hartford, CT, USA. Syndemic theory helps to elucidate the tendency for multiple co-terminus and interacting epidemics to develop under conditions of health and social disparity. Based on enhanced focus group and in-depth interview data, the paper argues that respondents employed a cultural logic of risk assessment which put them at high risk for STD infection. This cultural logic was shaped by their experiences of growing up in the inner city which included: coming of age in an impoverished family, living in a broken home, experiencing domestic violence, limited expectations of the future, limited exposure to positive role models, lack of expectation of the dependency of others, and fear of intimacy.

Dementia is an important cause of morbidity in the geriatric population in this community, where families take responsibility for the care of relatives with dementia.

Background The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level. Methods The qualitative study utilized focus-group methodology to explore research participants' experiences and preferences for the dissemination of research findings. Five focus groups were held with 53 participants who were recruited through existing community advisory boards in Arkansas. Results Participants stated that researchers should always offer to share research findings. Participants explained that disseminating findings is appropriate because of their sense of ownership of results, it encourages participation facilitating higher quality research, and it may foster greater trust between researchers and participants. Participants also provided insights on how research findings should be shared, including recommendations for appropriate mode, timing, and context, as well as ways to share sensitive findings and the role of community partners in dissemination. Conclusions This study is consistent with other studies that document participants' desire to receive research findings and expands our knowledge by documenting participants' rationale for why they think it is important and their recommendations for how to share results. Further research is needed to understand why researchers are not disseminating study findings to participants and to test the best ways to share results.

As the VA moves to cultivate community partnerships in order to personalize and expand access to care for rural veterans, pre-implementation processes with engaged stakeholders, such as those described here, can help guide other researchers and clinicians to achieve proactive and veteran-centered health care services.