1. Tributary junctions in stream networks provide unique habitats within fluvial networks by contributing differently sized sediment and organic materials, providing temperature refuge, and other conditions distinct from the receiving stream.These same attributes at tributaries entering lakes (inflow streams) support special, within-lake locations that are used by several organisms at some times of year, which we call lake deltas.2. Here we consider the evidence of these lake deltas as a special environment in terms of their physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. There are several potential contributions from tributary streams, and much of the emphasis has been on resource subsidies to lakes, but other factors may also contribute to the uniqueness of lake deltas.3. The degree to which these deltas provide productivity and biodiversity hotspots is not well known, but we present evidence in support of this assertion. We also offer suggestions for a suite of hypotheses that can be tested. These junctions may also provide an excellent model system for testing the consequences of resource subsidies (organic matter, invertebrates) to recipient communities from small to mid-sized streams.4. Consolidation of these ideas will allow testing for the uniqueness of these lake delta habitats and the mechanisms responsible, and perhaps promote greater efforts at protecting processes that sustain these areas in lakes.

Small lakes (< 1 km2) are physically, chemically, and biologically linked to their watersheds through hydrologic, terrestrial, and aerial delivery of materials. Inputs affecting lake function and structure, such as nutrient, energy, sediment, and large wood subsidies, arrive at the lake on three spatial scales, i.e., the lake watershed, lake-inflow streams, and lake riparian areas. Lakes are sinks in the waterscape and integrate cumulative inputs from the landscape. Lakes can therefore react to landscape disturbances such as forest harvesting. Forest harvesting and associated activities can induce changes in watershed water yields, inputs of organic and inorganic materials to lakes, and in lake temperatures and wind. These changes result in stressors that can alter the lake’s physical habitat, water quality, and food webs. Here we review the reported impacts of forest harvesting on small, temperate zone lakes. The magnitude of the lake response to harvesting can depend on factors such as the proportion of the watershed harvested, the intensity of this harvesting, silvicultural practices and other activities, and road construction and density. Other additional factors include the proximity of the lake to harvesting and its impact on hydrological pathways connecting perturbed areas to stream and lake systems. The majority of surveyed studies reported short-term increases in nutrient and energy inputs, increased sedimentation due to harvesting, and increases in wind speeds, where about half reported increases in primary production or decreases in zooplankton biomass. Results on benthic macroinvertebrate, fish, and amphibians were less frequently reported and were geographically variable. Variation in the direction and magnitude of a lake’s food web response is likely due to studies of lakes with differences in watershed characteristics and forestry activities that can affect the magnitude of the lake response (i.e., proportion of watershed harvesting, forestry operations methods, hydrological connections to the lake, and site-specific attributes). We also discuss watershed forestry management and the implementation of lakeshore riparian buffers in the context of reducing forestry impacts on lakes. Most studies have been short-term, and the long-term, cumulative effects of forest harvesting on lake ecosystems remain unclear.

Lake deltas (LDs) receive nutrient and energy subsidies from upstream habitats. These inputs can support LD benthic production. However, LDs may also receive impacts from upstream disturbance. Small lakes in coastal British Columbia often have inflow streams from areas with forest harvesting, which is pervasive in this region. Forest harvesting impacts can alter stream production, although downstream impacts on lakes, compared to streams, are less studied and understood. We aimed to test whether benthic LD communities (biofilm and invertebrates) are more productive and/or diverse compared to other communities along the lakeshore (LS) (non-LDs), and whether there are differences in LD communities associated with upstream harvesting. We compared LD communities with upstream riparian areas that were harvested (HLD) or relatively undisturbed (ULD), and LS sites. We found that while community structure was similar across sites, ULDs had higher biofilm and invertebrate standing stocks (1.5- and 2-times higher, respectively) than HLDs and LS sites. Our results suggest subsidies and benthic production were higher at ULDs. These results advance our understanding of forest harvesting disturbance and stream-lake connectivity.