Objective: The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a battery of 7 unloaded tests designed to rate human movement competency. Injury rates vary across the different level of a sport. The purpose of this critical review was to determine whether normative FMS composite scores differ across high school, collegiate, and professional athletic populations and to determine whether normative composite scores correlate with rates of severe injury across different collegiate sports. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases from inception to September 2017 with the following syntax: “functional movement screen*” OR “movement screen*”. Additional records were identified by citation tracking and hand search of articles. Study Selection: A total of 708 records identified, of which 36 were included. Studies were included if they reported a FMS composite score for one of the groups. Data Extraction: Two reviewers (T.R.P. and F.K.) screened records for the author and year; sample size; study design; sport(s); number, age, and sex of participants; testing conditions; methodological quality; and mean or median composite score(s). Data Synthesis: Normative FMS composite scores were invariant to level of play, with 61% of reported scores falling between 14 and 16, despite injury rates increasing by level of play. Scores for high school, college, and professional athletes were 14.1, 14.8, and 15.7, respectively. There was a significant positive relationship between composite scores and rate of severe injury in college sports (r(11) = 0.66, P = 0.014). Conclusions: Our findings potentially undermine the FMS's predictive validity. Although the FMS may have other applications, this critical review provides further evidence against the composite score for injury prediction in competitive athletes.

Although resting pectoralis minor muscle length differed between groups, pectoralis minor muscle lengthening and scapulothoracic motion were similar between participants with short and typical resting pectoralis minor muscle length. Additional studies are needed to better understand the role of pectoralis minor muscle elongation on scapulothoracic motion.

Context: Swimmers are known for high training loads and overuse injuries, but few studies have investigated the relationship between the two at the college level. Objective: To determine the association between workload and non-contact musculoskeletal injury in college swimmers. We hypothesized (1) higher overall workload (kilometers swum throughout the season) would be associated with increased odds of injury and (2) the ratio of the current week's (acute) workload divided by the current month's (chronic) workload (i.e., the acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR)) would be more strongly associated with odds of injury than acute or chronic workloads alone. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: College natatorium. Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-seven Division III college swimmers. Main Outcome Measures: Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for injury relative to high workloads and high ACWRs. Injury rates for several ranges of workloads and ACWRs were also calculated. Results: Eleven participants (29.7%) sustained 12 injuries, with seven injuries occurring during the participants' winter training trip. Injury was associated with high acute workloads (OR = 27.1 [95% CI = 8.2, 89.8]) and high ACWRs (OR = 25.1 [95% CI = 7.7, 81.4]) but not high chronic workloads (OR = 2.6 [95% CI = 0.3, 20.0]) or overall workloads (OR = 1.00 [95% CI = 0.99, 1.01]). High acute workloads (>37.2 km/week) and high ACWRs (>1.56) increased injury rate from ≤1% to 15% and 14%, respectively, compared to all lower acute workloads and ACWRs. Conclusions: College swimmers can tolerate high workloads spread out over the season. However, caution should be used when prescribing high acute workloads and high ACWRs (e.g., winter training trip) due to increased odds of injury.

Context: Swimming technique is widely believed to influence performance, but this relationship has rarely been tested objectively using a real-time poolside assessment. Objective: To determine the (1) test–retest reliability, interrater reliability, and criterion validity (live vs video) of real-time poolside assessment of upper limb (UL) errors in front crawl (FC) swimming technique and (2) the relationship between UL errors and FC swimming performance. Design: Cross-sectional reliability, validity, and correlational study. Setting: Swim team practice at a college natatorium. Participants: Thirty-nine Division III college swimmers (21 women and 18 men, age = 19 [1] y, swimming experience = 11 [3] y). Main Outcome Measures: Seven UL errors in FC swimming technique, many of which involved unnecessary vertical and mediolateral motions, were assessed in real time from outside the pool during swim practice. Test–retest reliability, interrater reliability, and criterion validity were calculated using Cohen kappa (κ) and weighted kappa (κw). Swimming performance was determined by the participants’ best FC events relative to the conference records. The correlation between total UL errors and FC swimming performance was assessed with Pearson r. Results: Cohen κ and κw were moderate for the majority of errors, with the following ranges: 0.46 to 0.90 (test–retest), −0.01 to 1.00 (interrater), and 0.36 to 0.66 (criterion validity). There was a significant correlation between total UL errors and FC swimming performance: r(24) = −.59 (P = .001, R2 = .35). Conclusions: Reliability and validity were moderate for the majority of errors. The fewer UL errors swimmers made while practicing FC, the faster their best FC race times tended to be relative to the conference record. UL errors in FC swimming technique explained 35% of the variance in performance.

No abstract