ehaviors related to self-regulation, such as substance use disorders or antisocial behaviors, have far-reaching consequences for affected individuals, their families, communities and society at large 1,2 . Collectively, this group of correlated traits are classified as externalizing 3 . Twin studies have demonstrated that externalizing liability is highly heritable (~80%) 4,5 . To date, however, no large-scale molecular genetic studies have utilized the extensive degree of genetic overlap among externalizing traits to aid gene discovery, as most studies have focused on individual disorders 6 . For many high-cost, high-risk behaviors with an externalizing component-opioid use disorder and suicide attempts 7 being salient examples-there are limited genotyped cases available for gene discovery 8,9 .A complementary strategy to the single-disease approach is to study the shared genetic architecture across traits in multivariate analyses, which boosts statistical power by pooling data across

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects.

Polygenic indexes (PGIs) are DNA-based predictors. Their value for research in many scientific disciplines is rapidly growing. As a resource for researchers, we used a consistent methodology to construct PGIs for 47 phenotypes in 11 datasets. To maximize the PGIs' prediction accuracies, we constructed them using genome-wide association studies-some of which are novel-from multiple data sources, including 23andMe and UK Biobank. We present a theoretical framework to help interpret analyses involving PGIs. A key insight is that a PGI can be understood as an unbiased but noisy measure of a latent variable we call the "additive SNP factor." Regressions in which the true regressor is the additive SNP factor but the PGI is used as its proxy therefore suffer from errors-in-variables bias. We derive an estimator that corrects for the bias, illustrate the correction, and make a Python tool for implementing it publicly available.

We systematically interrogate the joint genetic architecture of 11 major psychiatric disorders at biobehavioral, functional genomic, and molecular genetic levels of analysis. We identify four broad factors (Neurodevelopmental, Compulsive, Psychotic, and Internalizing) that underlie genetic correlations among the disorders, and test whether these factors adequately explain their genetic correlations with biobehavioral traits. We introduce Stratified Genomic Structural Equation Modelling, which we use to identify gene sets and genomic regions that disproportionately contribute to pleiotropy, including protein-truncating variant intolerant genes expressed in excitatory and GABAergic brain cells that are enriched for pleiotropy between disorders with psychotic features. Multivariate association analyses detect a total of 152 (20 novel) independent loci which act on the four factors, and identify nine loci that act heterogeneously across disorders within a factor. Despite moderate to high genetic correlations across all 11 disorders, we find very little utility of, or evidence for, a single dimension of genetic risk across psychiatric disorders.