Category: Other; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Custom and off-the-shelf orthotics frequently are prescribed by foot and ankle orthpaedic surgeons. This study aimed to quantify the rate at which patients receive their prescribed orthotic and explore the variables that could be predictive of patients’ receiving and using orthotics. Methods: We analyzed the demographics of 382 patients who received an orthotic prescription from a group of foot and ankle surgeons to assess variables predictive of patients receiving their prescribed orthotic. Of these 382 patients, 186 (49%) completed a survey regarding insurance status, cost of the orthotic, education, income, and satisfaction with the orthotic. This information was used to identify variables that may help identify patients who are at an increased risk of failing to receive their prescribed orthotic. Results: Patients received their orthotic at an overall rate of 61.2% (235/382). Patients with commercial insurance were more likely to receive their orthotic (67%) than patients with Medicaid (40%). Of the 186 patients who completed the survey, those whose insurance covered all or part of their orthotic were more likely to receive their orthotic (100% and 96%, respectively) compared to those whose insurance did not cover the orthotic (81.5%). Overall 86.5% reported being ‘better’ or ‘completely relieved’ with orthotic use, and 13.4% reported ‘no difference’ or ‘worse.’ There were no differences in receive rates according to age or gender, but there was a disparity in race, with 71% (155/219) of white and only 48% (72/151) of black patients receiving their orthotics. Conclusion: A substantial number of patients (38.8%) do not receive their physician-prescribed orthotic. Patients who do receive and use their orthotic report positive results. Insurance status, race, and coverage of costs by the insurance company play important roles in predicting which patients are at risk for failing to receive their orthotic.

Objectives: To assess the effects of Krackow suture technique on the vascularity of the patellar tendon. Methods: Six fresh-frozen matched pair cadaveric knee specimens were used. The superficial femoral arteries were cannulated in all knees. The experimental knee underwent an anterior approach, patellar tendon transection from the inferior pole of the patella, 4-strand Krackow stitch placement, patellar tendon repair via 3-bone tunnels, and standard skin closure. The control knee underwent the identical procedure without Krackow stitching. All specimens then underwent precontrast and postcontrast enhanced quantitative magnetic resonance imaging assessment (with gadolinium-based contrast agent). Region of interest analysis was performed to assess for variation in signal enhancement between the experimental and control limbs in various patellar tendon regions and subregions. Latex infusion and anatomical dissection were performed to further evaluate vessel integrity and assess extrinsic vascularity. Results: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall arterial contributions. A small but nonsignificant decrease of 7.5% (SD ± 7.1%) in arterial contributions to the entire tendon was observed. Small nonstatistically significant regional decreases throughout the tendon were also detected. In the regional analysis, the largest to smallest decreases in arterial contributions after suture placement were found in the inferomedial, superolateral, lateral, and inferior tendon subregions. In the anatomical dissection, nutrient branches were seen dorsally and posteroinferiorly. Conclusion: The vascularity of the patellar tendon was not significantly affected by Krackow suture placement. Analysis demonstrated small and not statistically significant decreases in arterial contributions, suggesting this technique does not significantly compromise arterial perfusion.

Background: This study looked at the effect of patient demographics, insurance status, education, and patient opinion on whether various orthotic footwear prescribed for a variety of diagnoses were received by the patient. The study also assessed the effect of the orthoses on relief of symptoms. Methods: Chart review documented patient demographics, diagnoses, and medical comorbidities. Eligible patients completed a survey either while in the clinic or by phone after their clinic visit. Results: Of the 382 patients prescribed orthoses, 235 (61.5%) received their orthoses; 186 (48.7%) filled out the survey. Race and whether or not the patient received the orthosis were found to be significant predictors of survey completion. Race, type of insurance, and amount of orthotic cost covered by insurance were significant predictors of whether or not patients received their prescribed orthoses. Type of orthosis, diabetes as a comorbidity, education, income, sex, and diagnosis were not significant predictors of whether the patient received the orthosis. Qualitative results from the survey revealed that among those receiving their orthoses, 87% experienced improvement in symptoms: 21% felt completely relieved, 66% felt better, 10% felt no different, and 3% felt worse. Conclusions: We found that white patients had almost 3 times the odds of receiving prescribed orthoses as black patients, even after controlling for type of insurance, suggesting race to be the primary driver of discrepancies, raising the question of what can be done to address these inequalities. While large, systematic change will be necessary, some strategies can be employed by those working directly in patient care, such as informing primary care practices of their ability to see patients with limited insurance, limiting blanket refusal policies for government insurance, and educating office staff on how to efficiently work with Medicare and Medicaid. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.