Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the core competencies required for emergency medicine (EM) clerkships in Canada. Existing EM curricula have been developed through informal consensus or local efforts. The Delphi process has been used extensively as a means for establishing consensus. Aim: The purpose of this project was to define core competencies for EM clerkships in Canada, to validate a Delphi process in the context of national curriculum development, and to demonstrate the adoption of the CanMEDS physician competency paradigm in the undergraduate medical education realm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a modified Delphi process can result in a strong consensus around a realistic number of core competencies for EM clerkships. We propose that such a method could be used by other medical specialties and health professions to develop rotation-specific core competencies.
Objective: Residents must become proficient in a variety of procedures. The practice of learning procedural skills on patients has come under ethical scrutiny, giving rise to the concept of simulation-based medical education. Resident training in a simulated environment allows skill acquisition without compromising patient safety. We assessed the impact of a simulation-based procedural skills training course on residents' competence in the performance of critical resuscitation procedures. Methods: We solicited self-assessments of the knowledge and clinical skills required to perform resuscitation procedures from a cross-sectional multidisciplinary sample of 28 resident study participants. Participants were then exposed to an intensive 8-hour simulation-based training program, and asked to repeat the self-assessment questionnaires on completion of the course, and again 3 months later. We assessed the validity of the self-assessment questionnaire by evaluating participants' skills acquisition through an Objective Structured Clinical Examination station. Results: We found statistically significant improvements in participants' ratings of both knowledge and clinical skills during the 3 self-assessment periods (p < 0.001). The participants' year of postgraduate training influenced their self-assessment of knowledge (F 2,25 = 4.91, p < 0.01) and clinical skills (F 2,25 = 10.89, p < 0.001). At the 3-month follow-up, junior-level residents showed consistent improvement from their baseline scores, but had regressed from their posttraining measures. Senior-level residents continued to show further increases in their assessments of both clinical skills and knowledge beyond the simulation-based training course. Conclusion: Significant improvement in self-assessed theoretical knowledge and procedural skill competence for residents can be achieved through participation in a simulation-based resuscitation course. Gains in perceived competence appear to be stable over time, with senior learners gaining further confidence at the 3-month follow-up. Our findings support the benefits of simulation-based training for residents.
Objectives: There is no consensus on what constitutes the core competencies for emergency medicine (EM) clerkship rotations in Canada. Existing EM curricula have been developed through informal consensus and often focus on EM content to be known at the end of training rather than what is an appropriate focus for a time-limited rotation in EM. We sought to define the core competencies for EM clerkship in Canada through consensus among an expert panel of Canadian EM educators. RÉ SUMÉObjectif: Il n'existe pas de consensus quant aux compé tences de base à acqué rir durant les stages cliniques en mé decine d'urgence (MU) au Canada. Les programmes actuels en MU ont é té é laboré s à partir de consensus atteints de faç on non structuré e, et souvent l'accent est mis sur le contenu à connaître à la fin de la formation plutô t que sur un bagage approprié de connaissances à acqué rir au cours d'un stage d'une duré e limité e. Aussi cherchions-nous à dé finir les
Background: Emergency department access block is a growing problem in emergency departments across Canada. Access block is defined as hospital occupancy >85% causing emergency department overcrowding. Hospital overcrowding leads to prolonged emergency department wait times, and delays in the transfer of admitted patients from the emergency department to inpatient beds. The relationship between elective admissions to hospital and emergency department wait times has not been adequately assessed. We undertook a simple linear regression analysis of the impact of elective admissions to hospital on emergency department length of stay. Methods: Linear regression analysis of the number of daily elective admissions to adult acute care beds in the Calgary Health Region in the year 2004 and the daily median emergency department length of stay was done to establish the relationship between elective admissions and Emergency Department length of stay. Results: 37,007 patients were admitted to adult acute care beds via the emergency department and 46,020 patients were admitted to adult acute care beds by all other routes. Regression analysis determined that there was no relationship between daily emergency department length of stay and the number of elective admissions per day. Conclusion: For the year 2004, in the Calgary Health Region, elective acute care admissions to hospital had no relationship to emergency department length of stay for patients admitted via the emergency department. Further study is required to determine causative factors that prolong Emergency Department length of stay. Emergency departments across Canada continue to struggle with the demands of providing high quality care with diminishing resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.