ImportancePatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have been reported to experience worse outcomes compared with patients without AF.ObjectiveTo assess differences between patients with AF and their counterparts without AF treated with MT for AIS, focusing on safety outcomes, clinical outcomes, and baseline characteristics in both groups.Data SourcesA systematic literature review of the English language literature from inception to July 14, 2022, was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases.Study SelectionStudies that focused on patients with and without AF treated with MT for AIS were included. Multiple reviewers screened studies to identify studies included in analysis.Data Extraction and SynthesisData were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline to ensure accuracy. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome of interest was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes of interest included rates of successful reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores of 2b to 3, 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and baseline patient characteristics.ResultsOf 1696 initially retrieved studies, 10 studies were included, with 6543 patients. Patients with AF were a mean of 10.17 (95% CI, 8.11-12.23) years older (P < .001) and had higher rates of hypertension (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.57-2.27]; P < .001) and diabetes (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.02-1.31]; P = .02). Overall, there were comparable rates of mRS scores of 0 to 2 between patients with AF and patients without AF (odds ratio [OR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.47-1.10]; P = .13), with significant heterogeneity among the included studies. After sensitivity analysis, the rate of mRS scores of 0 to 2 was significantly lower among patients with AF (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.81]; P < .001). Successful reperfusion rates were similar between the groups (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.78-1.58]; P = .57). The rate of SICH was similar between groups (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.31]; P = .68). Mortality was significantly higher in the AF group (OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.12-1.92]; P = .005).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with AF experienced worse 90-day outcomes, even in the setting of similar rates of successful reperfusion. This was likely associated with greater age and greater rates of comorbidities among patients with AF.
Background Delayed neurological improvement (DNI) is a phenomenon that involves patient improvement in the absence of early neurological change following treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The patient characteristics associated with this condition are largely unexplored. Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Scopus. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to test the association between patient characteristics and achievement of DNI. Results Seven studies, with 3266 patients, were included in our analysis. All studies reported a different definition of DNI, with five studies focusing on rates of good functional outcome at 90 days post-treatment in the absence of early neurological improvement. Use of intravenous thrombolytics was associated with increased rates of DNI (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.00; p = 0.002). Atrial fibrillation was associated with decreased rates of DNI (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.82; p < 0.001), as was hypertension (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83, p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.90; p = 0.005). On average, patients who achieved DNI were 6.30 years younger than their non-DNI counterparts ( MD −6.30, 95% CI −9.19 to −3.41; p < 0.001). There were modest associations between male sex and DNI (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.74, p = 0.042), and smoking and DNI (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.59, p = 0.027). Conclusions DNI is a phenomenon that is not presently well understood. Lack of uniformity among definitions of DNI hinders efforts to explore DNI and the factors associated with its occurrence. Future studies should work to establish a consensus definition of DNI to determine its causes and significance more accurately.
Background Early neurological deterioration (END) is a potential predictor for 90-day outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand whether END can be used as a surrogate for long-term outcomes. Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase. END definition was cataloged for each included study. Outcomes of interest included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all definitions of END. Results We included seven studies with 2992 patients in our analysis. There was a significant, inverse association with END and mRS 0–2 rates (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.08–0.29; P-value< 0.001). Moreover, END was a significant predictor of increased odds for reported sICH rates (OR = 16.37; 95% CI = 7.66–34.99; P-value< 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant association between END and increase in mortality rates (OR = 6.79; 95% CI = 2.62–17.62; P-value< 0.001). There was no significant association between END and rates of TICI 2b-3 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.27–1.05; p = 0.069). Conclusions Broadly defined, END holds value as a potential predictor of rates of mRS 0–2 at 90 days and is associated with higher rates of mortality and sICH, but had no correlation with TICI 2b-3.
Background Collateral status may facilitate clot removal and affect rates of successful reperfusion following endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Papers which focused on collateral status and patients treated with EVT for AIS were included in our analysis. Outcomes of interest included collateral score grading, rates of successful reperfusion defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b-3 and onset to revascularization time. We calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on collateral status. Results 16 studies, with 6073 patients, were included in our analysis. Among the included studies, there were six different collateral grading scales, which were dichotomized into “good to moderate” and “poor” collaterals. Odds of successful reperfusion were significantly higher among patients with good to moderate collateral circulation compared to those with poor collaterals (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.09; P-value < 0.001); however, there was heterogeneity among included studies (I2 = 5 4%; P-value = 0.008). Onset to revascularization time was comparable between patients with good to moderate collateral circulation compared to those with poor collaterals (MD = 3.91 min; 95% CI = −8.71 to 16.53; P-value = 0.544); however, there was heterogeneity among included studies (I2= 60%; P-value = 0.014). Conclusions The presence of good collaterals may increase the odds of achieving successful reperfusion following EVT for AIS. Improved collateral flow was associated with improved angiographic outcomes, although future work is needed to determine if a causal relationship exists.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.