This study aims to determine the role of analyst coverage as a moderating variable in the relationship between internal monitoring mechanisms and the level of application of accounting conservatism. This research was conducted on a 990 sample of non-financial companies during the 2014-2018 period which was obtained from the official website of the IDX and related companies. Data processing uses the Stata14 application with moderated regression analysis (MRA) testing. The results of this study indicate that two components of internal monitoring mechanisms, namely board size and board independent have a negative relationship with accounting conservatism, while audit committee independent do not have a relationship with accounting conservatism. Furthermore, analyst coverage is proven to be quasi-moderation in the relationship between board size and audit committee independent with the level of accounting conservatism implementation. The relationship model between board independent and accounting conservatism cannot show the moderating role of analyst coverage, and only being an additional independent variable.Keywords: accounting conservatism, analyst coverage, audit committee independent, board independent, board size, monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.