High-fat diets have been identified as a major cause of obesity and a potential risk factor for breast cancer. Fat tissue, also known as adipose tissue, produces an excess of estrogen, which has been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer. Determining the impact of HFDs in the development and progression of breast cancer is essential, as it will enable us to identify the role of dietary modification in preventing and managing the disease.The impact of a high-fat diet (HFD) on the development of breast cancer in humans has yet to be fully explained, as very few human studies are available to effectively analyze the effect fatty food has on breast cancer development. This meta-analysis, therefore, seeks to determine the strength of association, if any, between HFD and an increased risk of breast cancer development. This research will help inform good eating habits, potentially reducing the disease's incidence and outcome. This meta-analysis examined eight (8) papers from various nations examining the effect of a high-fat diet as a risk factor for breast cancer development between 2010 and 2020. The study employed the multivariableadjusted hazard ratio (H.R.), odds ratio (OR), or relative risk (R.R.) from the studies. Breast cancer cases were histologically and radiologically confirmed in the studies evaluated, and validated food frequency questionnaires were used to assess their dietary patterns. This metanalysis study found a substantial link between a high-fat diet and an increased risk of breast cancer, with statistically significant results (I 2 = 93.38%, p0.05). Changes in dietary fat consumption may thus help mitigate some of the unfavorable consequences of breast cancer and survival. Even if further research is needed to support this assertion, the findings are compelling enough to advocate for low-fat, healthy diets to avoid breast cancer.

Prostate cancer remains the most common non-skin cancer in men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is recognized as a biomarker for the diagnosis, monitoring, and risk prediction of prostate cancer. However, its role in prostate cancer screening has been controversial. While some authorities have recommended its use for screening, others have stated otherwise. Some clarity is required about its precise role in clinical practice. There need to be more consistent recommendations surrounding using PSA screening in clinical practice. Serum PSA measurements show variable reliability when screening for Prostate cancer, given the dynamics of PSA physiology and the conflicting results from two large, randomized control trials that sought to determine its role in prostate cancer screening and early detection. Hence surrogate measures like PSA density, PSA velocity, free-to-complexed PSA ratio, and percentage Pro-PSA among others, have been used to improve the predictive utility of this assay for Prostate cancer diagnosis. However, the debate on screening still lingers. The current review aims to highlight the controversies and objectively outline the current recommendations. This literature review examined scholarly papers and recommendations about the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening with the aim to rationalize the pros and cons of such approaches. We concluded that although more recent guidelines from the USPSTF recommend that screening be based on individual preference and professional judgment by the healthcare provider, differences in the specific details on how to best employ a PSA screening program still exist and require further review.