The prevalence of obesity among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has increased significantly and may be linked to the use of antiretroviral therapy. Although weight‐loss medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are recommended as an adjunct to diet and exercise to treat obesity in the general population, little is known about the safety and efficacy of these drugs specifically in persons living with HIV. We review the available evidence regarding the effective use of weight‐loss pharmacotherapy in persons living with HIV and its potential to interact with antiretroviral therapy. Persons living with HIV are frequently not reported or included in clinical trials for weight‐loss medications; however, treatment efficacy is likely similar to the general population. Several important reported or theoretical drug‐drug interactions exist between antiobesity pharmacotherapy and antiretroviral therapy. Orlistat is a weight‐loss drug available in the United States without a prescription and was linked to HIV viral rebound in several case reports. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for loss of HIV viremia control when certain weight‐loss pharmacotherapies are used in combination with antiretrovirals.

Detectable troughs were noted in almost half of patients with concentrations obtained. A clinically significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted in patients with detectable concentrations. Continued work should be directed to better understand outcomes and monitoring in children requiring inhaled tobramycin.

Background: Immunizations are a common source of pain and anxiety within the pediatric population. Implementation of lidocaine 4% cream, which has a short onset of action, as a standard of care for immunization practices may be feasible. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 4% cream as pain management during immunizations and to evaluate satisfaction of caregivers and nursing staff. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in an urban clinic, which included patients who were ≤ 14 months old accompanied by a caregiver who witnessed the patient receiving an immunization within the previous 7 months. Patients were randomized to receive either lidocaine 4% cream or placebo cream prior to vaccination. Time to cry and duration of cry were recorded. Caregivers completed surveys evaluating attitudes toward pain associated with immunizations as well as their satisfaction with the immunization process through Likert Scale ratings. Nurses completed a questionnaire assessing efficacy and feasibility of lidocaine 4% cream for pain management. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis in order to achieve 80% power with a p-value < 0.05. Mean duration of cry in patients receiving lidocaine 4% cream was 48.6 seconds in comparison to 65.9 seconds in patients receiving placebo (95%CI, −33.97 seconds to −0.48 seconds; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Lidocaine 4% cream decreased total duration of cry following vaccinations in comparison to placebo with both caregivers and nurses willing to utilize lidocaine 4% cream in a clinic setting if available