What is already known about this subject • Polypharmacy has been linked to heightened risk of occurrence of drug‐related problems (DRPs) and a detrimental health outcome. • Polypharmacy has been variously defined; in research studies a commonly applied definition has been the concomitant use of five or more drugs. • The value of using a definite number of drugs as a cut‐off to describe polypharmacy as a risk factor for the occurrence of DRPs has not been validated. What this study adds • Nearly half of the patients admitted to general hospitals used five or more drugs; during the hospital stay these patients were prescribed as many new drugs as those admitted with fewer drugs. • The presence of DRPs increased approximately linearly with the number of drugs used, for the range of one to >11 drugs. • To set a strict cut‐off to identify polypharmacy and declare that using more than this number of drugs represents a potential risk for occurrence of DRPs, is of limited value in clinical practice. Aim To investigate whether polypharmacy defined as a definite number of drugs is a suitable indicator for describing the risk of occurrence of drug‐related problems (DRPs) in a hospital setting. Methods Patients admitted to six internal medicine and two rheumatology departments in five hospitals were consecutively included and followed during the hospital stay, with particular attention to medication and DRPs. Comparisons were made between patients admitted with five or more drugs and with less than five drugs. Clinical pharmacists assessed DRPs by reviewing medical records and by participating in multidisciplinary team discussions. Results Of a total of 827 patients, 391 (47%) used five or more drugs on admission. Patients admitted with five or more and less than five drugs were prescribed the same number of drugs after admission: 4.1 vs. 3.9 drugs [P = 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.57, 0.23], respectively. The proportion of drugs used on admission which was associated with DRPs was similar in the patient group admitted with five or more drugs and in those admitted with less than five drugs. The number of DRPs per patient increased approximately linearly with the increase in number of drugs used; one unit increase in number of drugs yielded a 8.6% increase in the number of DRPs (95% CI 1.07, 1.10). Conclusion The number of DRPs per patient was linearly related to the number of drugs used on admission. To set a strict cut‐off to identify polypharmacy and declare that using more than this number of drugs represents a potential risk for occurrence of DRPs, is of limited value when assessing DRPs in a clinical setting.

The majority of hospitalised patients in our study had DRPs. The number of drugs used and the number of clinical/pharmacological risk factors significantly and independently influenced the risk for DRPs. Procedures for identification of, and intervention on, actual and potential DRPs, along with awareness of drugs carrying a high risk for DRPs, are important elements of drug therapy and may contribute to diminishing drug-related morbidity and mortality.

The study findings indicate that all aspects of balance control deteriorate with increasing severity of cognitive impairment and that executive function plays an important role in balance control. Physical therapists should pay attention to these findings both in clinical practice and in future research.

The distinct geographic variation in the global incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma reflects a complex etiology involving viral, environmental, and genetic components. The high to intermediate rates observed in endemic areas contrast markedly with the uniformly low rates seen in much of the world. An interesting epidemiologic observation is the early peak in ageincidence curves observed in certain geographically disparate populations, suggestive of distinct causal entities and the possible exhaustion of susceptible individuals from the population at a certain age. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the age-incidence profiles of NPC worldwide on partitioning populations according to level of risk, in an effort to provide clues about the importance of early-in-life factors and genetic susceptibility. Using data from 23 high-quality population-based cancer registries for the period 1983-1997, a key finding was the consistent pattern of bimodality that emerged across low-risk populations, irrespective of geographic location. Continual increases in NPC risk by age up to a first peak in late adolescence/early adulthood (ages 15-24 years) were observed, followed by a second peak later in life (ages 65-79 years). No such early peak in NPC incidence by age group was evident among the high-risk populations studied. These findings are discussed according to existing lines of biological and epidemiologic evidence related to level of population risk, age at diagnosis, and histologic subtype. A modified model for NPC tumor development is proposed on the basis of these observations. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(9):2356 -65)