A complex of
G719X
and
S768I
mutations is infrequently observed, constituting less than 0.3% of all
EGFR
‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the response to first‐line TKIs is inconsistent in the literature. In this study, we report a patient with metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer carrying rare
EGFR
compound mutations of
G719X
and
S768I
who benefited from first‐line treatment with gefitinib in Vietnam. This patient had a prolonged response lasting over 44 months with first‐generation TKI. He continued to take gefitinib without experiencing serious adverse events. NSCLC with a rare complex of
G719X
and
S768I
mutation revealed a good response to gefitinib.
Background: Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary is a rare disease and presents with two clinically and molecularly distinct subtypes: the juvenile and the adult type. GCT is considered as a malignant tumor with an indolent course and a tendency toward late recurrence. Purpose: To assess the clinical and paraclinical features, treatment findings, survival outcomes, and explored the prognostic factors in the granulosa cell tumor. Methods: The current study was conducted on 28 GCT patients who had surgical operations and adjuvant chemotherapy (stage IC-IV) by applying a retrospective cohort analysis. The clinical and paraclinical characteristics were recorded. Recurrent status was evaluated for analysis with clinical and paraclinical features and survival. All GCT patients’ survival were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank models. Results: 17.9% of patients experienced a relapse and two patients died due to disease. The mean time from initial diagnose to recurrence was 40.21 months. The 5-year OS and DFS of stage I-II were 100% and 80.8%, and of stage III were 50% and 25%, respectively. In survival analyses, using the log-rank test, age ≥50 years, irregular menstruation, stage I-II, and absence of residual lesion were all significant predictors for the improved DFS. Stage I-II and absence of residual lesion were associated significantly with better OS. Mean of age, FIGO stage, and residual lesion during surgery had significant differences to recurrent rate (p < <0.05). The multivariate model revealed that these factors didn’t remain as an independent prognostic variable. Conclusion: FIGO stage and residual lesion during surgery had significant differences in survival and recurrent rate.
Squamous cell carcinoma admixed with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix is an extremely rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. We report a 50-year-old woman with mixed squamous cell carcinoma and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix with an individual history of early-stage breast cancer. She was diagnosed preoperatively with cervical cancer stage FIGO 1B2. However, during surgery, a lesion was found in Douglas’s peritoneum. The histopathological result of surgical specimens was mixed squamous cell carcinoma and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Then, she received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Currently, after 3 months of treatment, she has not developed recurrent lesions.
Fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma is a special variant of spindle cell carcinoma, a type of metaplastic carcinomas. It has a favorable prognosis, unlike other metaplastic carcinomas, with a particular clinical behavior characterized by frequent local recurrence, the meager potential for axillary lymph nodes, and distant metastases. We presented the case of a 51-year-old female with a large mass on the left breast, which was successfully removed by surgical resection. The pathological diagnosis was fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma with the help of morphology and immunohistochemistry adjustment.
Introduction
The combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AP) is widely used in our country for the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer as well as metastatic breast cancer. The AP regimen has shown promise as a neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer that improves pathological complete response (pCR), increases the rate of conservative surgery, and improves the survival of patients. However, up to now, no research has evaluated the response of this regimen for the neoadjuvant treatment of advanced breast cancer, especially with a 10-year period of follow-up.
Methods
This retrospective analysis reviewed 126 patients with inoperable stage III breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin 50 mg/m
2
plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m
2
every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses followed by surgery. pCR was evaluated. Survival was analyzed for all breast cancer patients using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank models.
Results
Of 126 women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the overall pCR rate was 25.4% and was significantly higher in patients with tumor stage cT1–T2, hormone receptor-negative (HR-negative), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease. Patients achieving pCR had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Ten-year DFS rates were 43.8% vs. 25.0% (
p
= 0.030) and 10-year OS rates were 59.4% vs. 28.9% (
p
= 0.003) for patients with pCR and non-pCR, respectively. The cumulative 10-year DFS was 19.6% for patients with HR-negative disease and 37.3% for those with HR-positive disease. Achieving pCR was associated with improved 10-year OS and DFS. Several clinicopathological features were closely associated with pCR in the inoperable stage III breast cancer patients who were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Conclusion
Achieving pCR was associated with improved 10-year OS and DFS. Patients with advanced breast cancer with HR-negative and HER2-positive status who benefited from the AP neoadjuvant therapy regimen were significantly more likely to achieve pCR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.