IMPORTANCE Limbal stem cell transplant (LSCT) can be categorized as direct autologous limbal transplant (AULT), direct allogenic limbal transplant (ALLT), cultivated autologous limbal stem cells transplant (cAULT), and cultivated allogenic limbal stem cells transplant (cALLT). To our knowledge, there is no study directly comparing the outcomes and complications of these procedures.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of different LSCT procedures.DATA SOURCE We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane without language filter for peer-reviewed articles about LSCT. The latest search was performed on June 30, 2019.STUDY SELECTION Clinical studies with the outcome of at least 20 eyes after LSCT were included. Animal studies and studies of other surgical interventions were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISTwo reviewers independently abstracted the data from each study. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I 2 statistic, and a meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESOutcome measures included the improvement of ocular surface, visual acuity (VA), and adverse events of recipient eyes and donor eyes.RESULTS Forty studies (2202 eyes) with a mean (SD) follow-up of 31.3 (20.9) months met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age of study participants was 38.4 (13.1) years, and men accounted for 74%. The number of eyes that underwent AULT, ALLT, cAULT, and cALLT were 505, 742, 771, and 184, respectively. Improvement of the ocular surface was achieved in 74.5% of all eyes, 85.7% of eyes after AULT (95% CI, 79.5%-90.3%), 84.7% after cAULT (95% CI, 77.2%-90.0%), 57.8% after ALLT (95% CI, 49.0%-66.1%), and 63.2% after cALLT (95% CI, 49.3%-75.2%). Autologous limbal transplantation resulted in a greater VA improvement rate (76%) than did the other 3 procedures (cAULT: 56.4%; ALLT: 52.3%; cALLT: 43.3%; all P < .001). The most common adverse events in all recipient eyes were recurrent/persistent epithelial erosion (10.5%; 95% CI, 7.2%-23.3%) and elevated intraocular pressure (intraocular pressure, 1.7%; 95% CI, 0.5%-7.8%). Patients who underwent ALLT had the highest rate of recurrent epithelial erosion (27.8%; 95% CI, 17.1%-41.9%) and intraocular pressure elevation (6.3%; 95% CI, 1.8%-19.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThese findings suggest LSCT can improve or stabilize the corneal surface with a low rate of severe ocular complications and that autologous LSCT may have a higher success rate and fewer complications than allogenic LSCT.

Phakic intraocular lenses revolutionize refractive surgery and continue to serve as an excellent option for vision correction in patients who are not ideal candidates for laser vision correction. This article will review special indications of phakic intraocular lenses in the clinical practice.

Purpose: To report a case of bilateral and repetitive corneal perforations after corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus in a woman harboring potentially pathogenic variants in the ZNF469 gene and to characterize the keratoconus phenotype in this woman and her daughter who shared the same ZNF469 mutations. Methods: Clinical characterization of the proband and her daughter followed by sequencing of the genes associated with brittle cornea syndrome, ZNF469 and PRDM5, in both individuals. Results: An Ashkenazi Jewish woman in her sixth decade presented with diffuse corneal thinning and progressive steepening consistent with keratoconus. After CXL, epithelium-off in the first eye and epithelium-on in the second, she developed spontaneous corneal perforations in each eye. Her daughter in her fourth decade demonstrated a similar pattern of diffuse corneal thinning and progressive corneal steepening but did not undergo CXL and did not develop corneal perforation. Screening of the ZNF469 and PRDM5 genes revealed 3 missense ZNF469 variants (c.2035G>A, c.10244G>C, and c.11119A>G) in cis arrangement on 1 allele of ZNF469 in both proband and her daughter. Although the 3 variants share low (<0.01) global minor allele frequencies, each has significantly higher minor allele frequencies (0.01–0.03) in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, leading to uncertainty regarding a pathogenic role for the identified variants. Conclusions: CXL may be associated with the development of corneal perforation in particular at-risk individuals with keratoconus. Identifying clinical and genetic risk factors, including screening of ZNF469 and PRDM5, may be useful in the prevention of significant complications after CXL.