The Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire version 2.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0) has started to be used in clinical trials recently. The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 v.2.0 and the correlation between the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Two hundred and two lung cancer patients were included in the study between January and March 2000. All the subscales met the minimal standards of reliability (Cronbach's alpha > or = 0.70). Only the role functioning scale differed among the three disease stages of patients (local, locoregional and metastatic). There was no statistically significant difference among therapy types. All interscale correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The strongest correlations were found among the physical functioning, role functioning and fatigue scales. Social functioning was closely related with physical, role, emotional and cognitive functioning. The weakest correlations were between nausea/vomiting and the other scales. Global quality of life (QOL) was substantially correlated with most of the scales except cognitive functioning. The coefficients for the correlation between the items differed between 0.12 and 0.97 and all the subscales were strongly correlated with the scales which they formed. The highest correlation between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and KPS was for physical functioning (r = 0.62, P< 0.05). The Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 is a valid (by means of interscales validity) and reliable instrument for Turkish lung cancer patients and can be used in clinical studies but needs supporting by the reference data on the QOL of the Turkish population.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by a chronic inflammatory process in the large and small airways, as well as in the lung parenchyma. Although the role of oral corticosteroids in the management of acute exacerbations of COPD is well documented, its role in stable COPD is not clear. We examined the anti-inflammatory effect of inhaled budesonide on the percentage of neutrophils and on interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and their correlation with spirometry and symptom scores. Twenty-six patients with stable COPD were randomised, in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with either 800 microg of inhaled budesonide or placebo for a 6-month period. The budesonide-treated subjects had significant reductions in IL-8 levels in the BAL after therapy (mean+/-sem, 1.53+/-0.72 at baseline vs. 0.70+/-0.48 ng/ml at 6 months, P=0.004) and a reduction in the mean percentages of neutrophils (17.16+/-2.67% vs. 13.25+/-2.28% P=0.002). The improvement in sputum production was of borderline (P=0.058) significance but there was no improvement in lung function. In stable patients with COPD, treatment with inhaled budesonide for a period of 6 months has a positive effect on markers of lung inflammation, as assessed by reduction in percentage neutrophils and IL-8 concentration in BAL.
Because of its special pharmacokinetic properties, plasma levels of theophylline show significant differences between individuals and also its therapeutic index is very low. So, plasma theophylline concentration measurements are essential for an effective and safe treatment. In the present study, age related differences in plasma theophylline levels were evaluated in patients from different age groups. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group I included patients under the age of 50 years, group II included patients over 50 years of age. Plasma theophylline levels were measured before and 3, 7, 12 and 19 h after a single dose given orally. The results show that 3, 7 and 19 h post dose, levels of theophylline were significantly higher in group II than in group I (P < 0.001).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.