Total talus arthroplasty (TTA) is a motion sparing procedure which can be utilized in specific and unique cases of talar necrosis and/or collapse. Literature on TTA is limited and predominantly composed of case studies or case reports. The purpose of this publication is to compile a systematic review of functional outcomes and complications associated with TTA. A search of current literature on TTA with >1-year follow-up was performed. Studies that described talar body implants or talonavicular implants were excluded. Twenty articles met inclusion criteria, which represented 161 TTAs. The average follow-up was 37.35 months (9-60 months). The indication for a TTA was predominately avascular necrosis of the talus, comprising 75.78% (122/161) of cases. The overall complication rate was 9.32% (15/161), with wound healing complications (5/161), replacement or implantation of a tibial component (4/161), and medial malleolus fracture (3/161) being the most common. One patient required proximal amputation due to residual pain and deformity. Functionally, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score increased from 27.93 preoperative to 81.99 postoperative and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot Score increased from 43.2 preoperative to 89.34 postoperative. Visual analog scale pain score decreased from 6.44 to 2.60. Total ankle range of motion increased from 36.60° to 46.74°. Ankle plantarflexion increased by 3.45° and ankle dorsiflexion increased by 6.69°. Overall, available literature on TTA appears to be in favor of the procedure when indicated. Levels of Evidence: 4

Background: Resident-run clinics provide autonomy and skill development for resident physicians. Many residency programs have such a clinic. No study has been performed investigating the effectiveness of these clinics in podiatric medical residency training. The purpose of this study was to gauge the resident physician–perceived benefit of such a clinic. Methods: A survey examining aspects of a resident-run clinic and resident clinical performance was distributed to all Doctor of Podiatric Medicine residency programs recognized by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education. To be included, a program must have had a contact e-mail listed in the Central Application Service for Podiatric Residencies residency contact directory; 208 residency programs met the criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests and χ2 tests. Significance was set a priori at P < .05. Results: Of 97 residents included, 58 (59.79%) had a resident-run clinic. Of those, 89.66% of residents stated they liked having such a clinic, and 53.85% of those without a resident-run clinic stated they would like to have one. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in how many patients each resident felt they could manage per hour or regarding their level of confidence in the following clinical scenarios: billing, coding, writing a note, placing orders, conversing with a patient, working with staff, diagnosing and treating basic pathology, and diagnosing and treating unique pathology. Conclusions: Resident-run clinics provide autonomy and skill development for podiatric medical residents. This preliminary study found there was no difference in resident-perceived benefit of such a clinic. Further research is needed to understand the utility of a resident-run clinic in podiatric medical residency training.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.