Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections continue to remain a significant global health challenge due to its morbidity and mortality profile. Almost 600,000 annual deaths are associated with the hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus. Patients on haemodialysis are at increased chance of acquiring infections. Infection among haemodialysis patients can lengthen the hospital stay and contribute to further complications. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection is common among the haemodialysis patients. Cross-contamination to patients through environmental surfaces, supplies, equipment, multiple-dose drug bottles, and staff members are among the modes and causes of transmission of hepatis B and C virus infections in haemodialysis facilities. The purpose of this research is to review the available information about the prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus in haemodialysis patients. Global prevalence for hepatitis C virus among haemodialysis units reported in studies ranged from 2.6% to 22.9% and 13.5% on average while for hepatitis B virus the prevalence is less than 10% while some studies report the prevalence ranging from 2-20%. Literature has variable prevalence for hepatitis B and C virus across the different geographical regions. The variation in prevalence is observed due to numerous risk factors contributing to the significant burden of the disease. Epidemiological data in recent times is lacking in literature and conduction of population-based surveys can be beneficial in generalizing the prevalence especially in gulf countries where limited studies are available.
Dialysis and kidney transplantation are the only available management approaches for these patients. Estimates show that the survival rates and quality of life are significantly higher for patients that receive kidney transplantation than others with dialysis. In addition, the effectiveness of preemptive kidney transplantation was well-evidenced in the literature. It had been further demonstrated that performing preemptive kidney transplantation significantly reduces the complications of renal transplantation and dialysis and was incredibly cost-effective when compared to dialysis. Furthermore, evidence regarding its effectiveness was well-established among studies in the literature as a safe primary management approach for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. This literature review discussed preemptive kidney transplantation's indications, outcomes and complications. Our findings indicated the efficacy of the approach for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. However, the appropriate selection of the patients was a critical issue. Besides, serious efforts should be exerted to prepare the patient perioperatively. Nevertheless, kidney functions were reported to increase following preemptive kidney transplantation. Graft rejection and delayed graft functions were also reported to follow preemptive kidney transplantation. However, the estimated rates are lower than those for patients having transplantation following the start of dialysis. We encourage further relevant investigations to further elaborate on the long-term findings, prognosis, and complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.