No abstract

Background Healthcare access has changed drastically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Elective medical procedures, including routine office visits, were restricted raising concerns regarding opioid and benzodiazepine provider and prescription availability. Objective To examine how the cancelation of elective medical procedures due to COVID-19 impacted the dispensing of opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions in Texas. Methods Interrupted time series analyses were preformed to examine changes in prescription trends for opioids and benzodiazepines before and after the restriction on elective medical procedures. Samples of patients who filled an opioid or benzodiazepine prescription from January 5, 2020 to May 12, 2020 were identified from the Texas Prescription Monitoring Program. Elective medical procedures were restricted starting March 23, 2020 indicating the beginning of the intervention period. Results Restricting elective procedures was associated with a significant decrease in the number of patients (β = −6029, 95%CI = −8810.40, −3246.72) and prescribers (β = −2784, 95%CI = −3671.09, −1896.19) filling and writing opioid prescriptions, respectively. Also, the number of patients filling benzodiazepine prescriptions decreased significantly (β = −1982, 95%CI = −3712.43, −252.14) as did the number of prescribers (β = −708.62, 95%CI = −1190.54, −226.71). Conclusion Restricting elective procedures resulted in a large care gap for patients taking opioid or benzodiazepine prescriptions.

Objectives: To measure the change in the daily number of patients receiving buprenorphine and buprenorphine prescribers during the early phase of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in Texas. Methods: Counts of the number of patients filling and number of providers prescribing buprenorphine were calculated for each weekday between November 4, 2019 and May 12, 2020. The change in daily patients and prescribers between March 2, 2020 and May 12, 2020, was modeled as a change in slope compared to the baseline period using autoregressive, interrupted time series regression. Results: The rate of change of daily buprenorphine prescriptions (β = −1.75, 95% CI = −5.8–2.34) and prescribers (β = −0.32, 95% CI = −1.47–0.82) declined insignificantly during the COVID-19 period compared to the baseline. Conclusions: Despite a 57% decline in ambulatory care utilization in the south-central US during March and April of 2020, health services utilization related to buprenorphine in Texas remained robust. Protecting access to buprenorphine as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to unfold will require intensive efforts from clinicians and policy makers alike. While the presented results are promising, researchers must continue monitoring and exploring the clinical and humanistic impact of COVID-19 on the treatment of substance use disorders.

No abstract