ObjectiveTo assess adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in anti-CD20 treated individuals with mRNA vaccination.BackgroundAnti-CD20 therapies attenuate humoral responses to vaccines. However, their effect on T cell responses is less clear. We examined B and T cell responses following COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) and other autoimmune inflammatory neurologic diseases (AINDs, e.g., autoimmune encephalitis, stiff person syndrome, etc.).Design/MethodsMS and AIND patients on anti-CD20 therapies were prospectively enrolled for longitudinal analysis of antibody and T cell responses after a 3rd COVID-19 vaccination. Serum antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the S1 spike protein (RBD-S1 IgG), neutralizing antibodies, and SARS-CoV-2 CD8 T cell responses, using activation-induced markers (AIM) and INF-γ release assays (EUROIMMUN, Germany), were measured at various time points including pre-vaccination, post initial vaccination series, and 4 and 12 weeks after 3rd dose.ResultsThirty-four MS and AIND participants are enrolled. Results for these patients (mean age 52 years-old, 79% female, 21 Pfizer, 13 Moderna) demonstrated attenuated RBD IgG antibody responses. However, a robust CD8 T cell response was observed, following a two-dose series, compared to non-immunosuppressed, age-matched vaccinated controls or unvaccinated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.01). T cell response was sustained long-term (>12 weeks post 3rd dose) in all 11 anti-CD20 patients analyzed thus far. Collections are completed for all participants at 12 weeks and analysis to be completed by 05/15/22. Further analysis includes correlation of the INF- γ release assay compared to RBD-CD8 T cell response detected by AIM assay.ConclusionsResults suggest that patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy generate a robust CD8 T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA after three doses but remain with attenuated humoral immune responses. Our observational study will provide important data to guide vaccine management in patients on or anticipating anti-CD20 therapy.

ObjectiveTo evaluate differences in concentrations of serum-based biomarkers obtained from a screened healthy control (HC) population compared to age and sex matched autoimmune and inflammatory neurologic disease (AIND) patients.BackgroundProtein markers of neuronal and glial injury have become important, minimally invasive biomarkers for understanding the impact of disease in various neurological disorders, including ongoing research into AINDs. Levels of these proteins in healthy individuals remain unclear.Design/MethodsNeurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and total tau (Tau) levels in AIND and HC participants will be compared. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, as inflammatory controls, will be analyzed as well. AIND and HC participant serum samples have been collected to obtain NfL, GFAP, UCH-L1, and Tau protein levels using Quanterix SR-XTM SIMOA. We plan to analyze and compare age and sex matched HC samples to AIND patients for each biomarker, ages ranging from 20-80 years old. Concentrations will be log transformed and analyzed with mixed model regression.ResultsHealthy Controls (130), AIND (255), and newly diagnosed/treatment naïve MS samples (681) have already been collected. Nineteen HC and AIND (includes NMDA, LGI1, TRIM46, CRMP5, MOG, DPPX, GABA-A, GAD-65) participants were analyzed. Preliminary results for HC show mean Nfl (10.3 pg/mL), GFAP (78.9 pg/mL), UCH-L1 (5.65 pg/mL), and Tau (0.53 pg/mL) levels, and for AIND patients mean Nfl (186.48 pg/mL), GFAP (434.92 pg/mL), UCH-L1 (71.38 pg/mL), and Tau (51.85 pg/mL) levels. While ongoing biomarker analysis will be completed with HC that are age and sex matched, the significantly higher levels in AIND patients highlights the importance of creating baseline values in HC to understand these same biomarkers in AIND patients.ConclusionsPreliminary results show NfL and GFAP levels are significantly higher in AIND patients versus HC. Baseline biomarker values are essential for understanding further research in biomarkers related to AIND.

No abstract