Objective Much of our knowledge of patient autonomy of DNR (do-not-resuscitate) is derived from the cross-sectional questionnaire surveys. Using signatures on statutory documents and medical records, we analyzed longitudinal data to understand the fact of terminal cancer patients’ autonomous DNR decision-making in Taiwan. Methods Using the medical information system database of one public medical center in Taiwan, we identified hospitalized cancer patients who died between Jan. 2017 and Dec. 2018, collected their demographic and clinical course data and records of their statutory DNR document types, letter of intent (DNR-LOI) signed by the patient personally and the consent form signed by their close relatives. Results We identified 1,338 signed DNR documents, 754 (56.35%) being DNR-LOI. Many patients had the first DNR order within their last week of life (40.81%). Signing the DNR-LOI was positively associated with being under the care of a family medicine physician prior to death at last hospitalization and having hospice palliative care and negatively associated with patient age ≥ 65 years, no formal education, having ≥ 3 children, having the first DNR order to death ≤ 29 days, and the last admission in an intensive care unit. Conclusions A substantial proportion of terminal cancer patients did not sign DNR documents by themselves. It indicates they may not know their actual terminal conditions and lose the last chance to grasp time to express their life values and wishes. Medical staff involving cancer patient care may need further education on the legal and ethical issues revolving around patient autonomy and training on communicating end-of-life options with the patients. We suggest proactively discussing DNR decision issues with terminal cancer patients no later than when their estimated survival is close to 1 month.
Background and Aims Taiwan is one of the most rapidly aging countries worldwide. Both physical activity and frailty affect older adults, and multidomain interventions prevent frailty. This study investigated the associations between physical activity, frailty, and the effects of multidomain intervention. Methods This study enrolled individuals aged 65 years or older. The physical activity level was assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Enrollees participated in a multidomain intervention program that consisted of twelve 120-min sessions administered over a 12-week period that included health education, cognitive training, and exercise programs. The effects of the intervention were evaluated using the instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA–SF), five-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS–5), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), timed up and go test (TUGT), and Fried’s frailty phenotype. Results In total, 106 older adults (aged 65–96 years) were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 77.47 ± 7.19 years, and 70.8% of participants were women. PASE scores were significantly lower among participants who were of older age, frail, and had a history of falls in the last 12 months. Frailty could be improved by multidomain interventions and was significantly positively correlated with depression, and negatively correlated with physical activity, mobility, cognition and daily living skills. Moreover, daily living skills were significantly positively correlated with cognition, mobility and physical activity, and negatively correlated with age, sex, and frailty. However, multidomain interventions did not affect daily living skills suggesting daily living skills may need to be maintained from a young age. Finally, results from multiple regressions suggest that physical activity, mobility and depression may be predictors of frailty. Conclusions Physical activity has an important role in frailty, may be a predictor of frailty, and strongly contributes to reducing frailty through multidomain intervention. Policies that encourage healthy aging should focus on increasing physical activity, maintaining basic daily living skills and reducing frailty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.