Bacampicillin (proposed international nonproprietary name), 1′-ethoxycarbonyloxyethyl 6-( d -α-aminophenylacetamido)penicillanate, is a new orally well-absorbed penicillin, highly active in vivo due to rapid transformation into ampicillin. The compound is stable in vitro at gastric pH and hydrolyzed slowly to ampicillin at neutral pH but very rapidly in the presence of biological fluids, e.g., tissue homogenates or serum. In vivo the transformation into ampicillin is so rapid that no unchanged compound could be detected in the blood after oral administration of bacampicillin to rats, dogs, and humans. On oral administration to mice, rats, and dogs, bacampicillin was found to be better absorbed than ampicillin, giving higher and earlier peak blood levels of ampicillin. The bioavailability of bacampicillin in rats and dogs was three to four times higher than that of an equimolar amount of ampicillin. On oral administration to rats, bacampicillin was found to give higher levels of ampicillin in organs such as the kidney, liver, and spleen than ampicillin itself. In “tissue cages” in rats, higher transudate levels of antibiotic were found after oral administration of bacampicillin than after ampicillin. On oral treatment of experimentally infected mice, bacampicillin was found to be more active than ampicillin.

Co-trimazine (sulphadiazine, 410 mg + trimethoprim, 90 mg) is a new drug combination developed especially for use in the treatment of urinary tract infections. In cross-over experiments in volunteers receiving daily doses of co-trimazine (2 X 500 mg and 1 X 1000 mg), co-trimoxazole (2X960 mg), or nitrofurantoin (3X50 mg), the degree of antibacterial activity of co-trimazine in the urine was at least as high as that of co-trimoxazole and much higher and more consistent than that of nitrofurantoin. In further cross-over experiments in volunteers receiving co-trimazine 2X1000 mg or co-trimoxazole 2X960 mg for four days no or only slight activity was found in the urine against a sulphonamide-resistant Group D streptococcus, but distinct synergistic activity between the components was found against four Escherichia coli strains sensitive to trimethoprim and sensitive or resistant to sulphonamides. Against three of the latter strains the degree of activity in the urine was higher after co-trimazine than after cotrimoxazole. The synergistic action of trimethoprim and sulphonamide in the urine appeared greater with the former than with the latter combination.

Co-trimazine is a new drug combination especially designed for the treatment of urinary tract infections. It consists of trimethoprim (90 mg) and sulphadiazine (410 mg). When combined in vitro, the components show high activity and a high frequency of synergy against urinary tract pathogens. After oral absorption sulphadiazine has a serum half-life similar to that of trimethoprim and is excreted in active form into the urine to a much higher degree than sulphamethoxazole. The ratio of the concentrations of trimethoprim and sulphadiazine in the urine following co-trimazine is favourable for a strong synergistic action between the compounds. In cross-over studies in volunteers receiving repeated daily doses of co-trimazine, either 500 mg twice daily or 1000 mg once daily, it was found that antibacterial activity in the urine was at least as high as that provided by co-trimoxazole (2 x 960 mg) and considerably higher and more uniform than that given by nitrofurantion (3 x 50 mg).

Plasma half life and in vitro activity were major criteria for selection of sulphonamides which are likely to give a strong synergistic action with trimethoprim in vivo. On the basis of literature data six sulphonamides, sulphadiazine, sulphachloropyridazine, sulphamethoxazole, sulphaisodimidine, sulphamerazine and sulphamethomidine appeared particularly suitable for combination with trimethoprim. An investigation of the activity in vitro of these compounds and their combinations with the latter against clinically isolated, sulphonamide-sensitive Klebsiella-Enterobacter and Escherichia coli strains showed optimal synergy at trimethoprim-sulphonamide ratios between 1:10 and 1:40, but that appreciable mutual potentiation occurred within a rather broad range of concentration ratios. Limited experiments indicated that synergy occurs less frequently and is less pronounced against sulphonamide resistant bacteria. The different sulphonamides behaved rather similarly in their combinations with trimethoprim, and in order to find the best sulphonamide, detailed comparisons of the pharmacokinetic properties of the different combinations are necessary.

No abstract