Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces wound infections and eases postoperative recovery. Nevertheless, the various differences among the primary studies and their partly flawed methodology make it difficult to generalise from these findings.

The development of the laparoscopic technique in surgery was so overwhelming that scientific evaluation could not keep in step. While investigators were still discussing the effects of the pneumoperitoneum on the healthy organism, laparoscopy was already performed in patients with an acute abdomen due to trauma or disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need of further experimental and clinical studies with relevant endpoints to gain external evidence concerning the benefits of diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopy for critically ill patients. In experiments with pigs we have shown that even in a healthy organism perfusion and energy metabolism of the small bowel is impaired by a pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide. Under the conditions of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome induced by infusion of endotoxin, the negative effects of the pneumoperitoneum were significantly amplified. Furthermore, we found that the increased intracranial pressure as caused by a head injury was further enhanced during a pneumoperitoneum but not by the alternative method of mechanical wall retraction. The current literature dealing with the effects of a pneumoperitoneum in critically ill patients is still controversial. Our data support the results of those authors who hold the opinion that creating a pneumoperitoneum in patients with acute abdominal problems means an additional serious burden that in single cases may lead to a disaster. As evidence is lacking, the current extension of laparoscopy into the field of intensive care medicine is still a human experiment that must be performed with high responsibility, extensive monitoring, and according to the rules of a clinical study.

Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are a frequent problem (10-15%) in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Over the last decade, new diagnostic and surgical techniques have expanded the options for their management. This report of the Consensus Development Conference is intended to summarize the current state of the art, including principal guidelines and an extensive review of the literature. Methods: An international panel of 12 experts met under the auspices of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives for gallstone disease. Prior to the conference, all the experts were asked to submit their arguments in the form of published results. All papers received were weighted according to their scientific quality and relevance. The preconsensus document compiled out of this correspondence was altered following a discussion of the external evidence made available by the panel members and presented at the public conference session. The personal experiences of the participants and other aspects of individualized therapy were also considered. Results: Our panel of experts agreed that the presence of common bile duct stones should be investigated in all patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Based on preoperative noninvasive diagnostics, either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiography should be employed for detecting CBDS. Eight of the 12 panelists recommended treating any diagnosed CBDS. For patients with no other extenuating circumstances, several treatment options exist. Stones can be extracted during ERCP, or either before or (in exceptional cases) after laparoscopic or open surgery. Bile duct clearance should always be combined with cholecystectomy. Evidence for further special aspects of CBDS treatment is equivocal and drawn from nonrandomized trials only. Conclusions: The management of common bile duct stones is currently undergoing some major changes. Many diagnostic and therapeutic strategies need further study.Key words: Common bile duct stones -GallbladderBile duct calculi -Laparoscopic cholecystectomy -Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography During the last decade, laparoscopic techniques for abdominal surgery have changed the options for the diagnosis and treatment of many abdominal pathologies. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has now become the standard procedure

No abstract

According to David L. Sackett evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence when making decisions about the care of individual patients. It means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external evidence from systematic research. On the basis of this idea in medicine the following communication summarizes and evaluates current statements and literature on laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. The topic is an example for excellent individual clinical performance on one hand, as gynecologists have perform laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy for decades. On the other hand, pregnancy is considered to be a contraindication for laparoscopic surgery by clinicians, because no excellent external evidence from systematic research is available. To find an answer to the question of whether pregnancy is a contraindication for laparoscopic surgery we performed a literature search and gained information by conducting interviews with several experts in gynecology and endoscopic operations. We concluded that there are almost no "scientific" data about endoscopic surgery during pregnancy, but gynecologists representing the "real world" seem to have no fear of the procedure for their patients. Between the two extremes, performing laparoscopic operations during pregnancy might be advantageous for maximal patient-friendly surgery, but considering pregnancy as a contraindication for the laparoscopic approach might be the safer treatment. The reader may decide that the subject on endoscopic surgery in pregnancy is still open.