We failed to demonstrate that emergency PTCA significantly improves survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction and early cardiogenic shock. Because the study was stopped prematurely, due to an insufficient patient inclusion rate, a clinically meaningful benefit of early reperfusion may have been missed.

No abstract

Background-Endothelin is a potent endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor peptide with proliferative properties. Elevated levels of the peptide occur in coronary artery disease; however, its pathophysiological role as a regulator of coronary tone and structure is uncertain. Endothelin-receptor antagonists are specific tools to clarify this issue and might be useful in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Methods and Results-In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study, we investigated the effects of the ET A /ET B endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan or placebo on systemic and coronary hemodynamics in 28 patients with angiographically documented stable coronary artery disease by quantitative coronary angiography and an intracoronary Doppler guidewire. Bosentan 200 mg IV decreased systolic blood pressure (PϽ0.05), whereas heart rate increased slightly (PϽ0.05). Coronary diameter increased, particularly in vessels with no or mild angiographic changes (PϽ0.01). Glycerol trinitrate did not further dilate these segments, whereas coronary diameter increased significantly after nitrate in the placebo group. The increase in coronary diameter after bosentan correlated inversely with plasma LDL-cholesterol levels (PϽ0.01) in both stenotic and angiographically normal coronary segments. Coronary flow velocity did not change. Bosentan was well tolerated. Conclusions-Endogenous endothelin exerts a vasoconstrictor tone in epicardial coronary arteries of patients with coronary artery disease, as evidenced by the vasodilation exerted by the combined ET A /ET B endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan under acute conditions. Bosentan can safely be given to these patients. Hence, further long-term studies are necessary to determine the therapeutic potential of endothelin-receptor antagonists in patients with coronary artery disease. (Circulation. 1998;98:2235-2240.)

No abstract

Acute coronary artery occlusion complicates 2-12% of the balloon angioplasty procedures, and despite repeat angioplasty, emergency surgical revascularization is often necessary. We report our initial experience with the emergency implantation of endoluminal stents for acute vessel closure after coronary balloon angioplasty. Nine patients received one stent, and two patients received two stents during the study period. Implantation was technically successful in all patients; there were no deaths, no myocardial infarctions as evidenced by Q wave on the electrocardiogram, and no need for emergency surgery. One additional patient, not satisfying the study inclusion criteria, died 16 hours after stent implantation from left ventricular failure and intractable arrythmias. Two patients in the study group had a moderate creatinine phosphokinase rise during the first 48 hours after implantation. During a median follow-up period of 3 months (range, 1-20 months), there have been no deaths and no need for elective coronary bypass surgery. One patient required emergency recanalization 3 months after implantation because of acute occlusion of the stented segment with limited myocardial infarction. Six patients have undergone control angiography, and none has developed chronic restenosis within the stented segment. For selected patients, coronary artery stenting appears to be a promising alternative to emergency bypass surgery after acute vessel occlusion during balloon angioplasty.