Introduction and Objective: Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly exercised in urology due to improvements in technical capabilities and experience. It comes with many advantages compared to open surgery such as lesser degree of pain and haemorrhage, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results. This study is carried out to evaluate the outcomes and complications of urological laparoscopic surgery cases performed Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, Bangladesh. Methods: This was a hospital based prospective observational study of total 29 patients, who received laparoscopic surgery of different kinds between January 2017 and September 2019 for urological causes with a minimum one month follow-up. Included patients were assessed in terms of demographic characteristics, preoperative diagnosis, type of laparoscopic approach, duration of surgery and hospitalization, complications after surgery and need for conversion to open surgery. Results: The mean age was 45.03 years where 12 patients were women and 17 were male. All patients underwent trans-peritoneal procedures where2 patients received renal cyst excision, 4 simple nephrectomy, 5 ureterolithotomy, 9 radical nephrectomy, 1 radical cystectomy, 2 adrenalectomy, 3 pyelolithotomy and 3 pyeloplasty. Three of the 29 patients required conversion to open surgery. Except these patients, no major complication or mortality was encountered. The mean duration of surgery for the most commonly applied procedures were as follows: renal cyst excision 87.5 (70-105) min, simple nephrectomy 141.25 (120-170) min, ureterolithotomy 120 (100-140) min, radical nephrectomy 215.56 (180-260) min, pyelolithotomy 120 (100-140) min, and pyeloplasty 156.67 (130-190) min. The mean hospital stay was 4.59±1.7 (2-8) days. Conclusions: The success and complications rate of the laparoscopic urological surgeries performed in our hospital were consistent with those reported in the literature. In the light of technological advances and increasing experience, we believe that laparoscopic surgery is an effective technique with excellent outcome along with a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in the field of urology. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 1, January 2020 p.17-23
Background: Urethroplasty is the treatment of choice for long segment anterior urethral stricture. Various types of graft can be used as substitution, but now a day Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG) is more popular with very promising results. This study was conducted to compare the outcome between dorsolateral free BMG graft and traditional staged reconstruction technique. Materials and methods: This was a hospital based quasi experimental study done prospectively on 64 patients, dividing in two groups, dorsolateral onlay BMG Urethroplasty (Group A) and Johanson’s staged Urethroplasty (Group B) from January 2016 to June 2018 for long segment (3080mm) anterior urethral stricture with a minimum 06 months follow-up. Two patients were failed to attened at follow up clinic were excluded from the study. Data were analyzed by student’s t test, and chi-square test where appropriate. Results: Total 62 patients were included in results (2 lost in follow-up) 32 patients with BMG (Group A) and 30 patients with Johanson’s urethroplasy (Group B) in 6 months follow-up where success rate of group A was 90.7% and group B 63.3% which is statistically significant. At the end of six months 22 patients (68.8%) in Group A had peak urnary flow rate more than 15 ml/sec, whereas only nine patients (33.3%) had had such flow rate in B group. Post operative complications were significantly higher in Group B. Eight patients (26.7%) in Group B had developed fistula and eleven patients (36.7%) had recurrence in Group B which is significantly higher then Group A. Conclusions: Dorsolateral onlay BMG urethroplasty is comparatively an effective technique with excellent functional outcome for long segment an- terior urethral stricture and feasible with good short term success. JCMCTA 2020 ; 31 (1) : 31-37
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.