Item response theory (IRT) true-score equating for the bifactor model is often conducted by first numerically integrating out specific factors from the item response function and then applying the unidimensional IRT true-score equating method to the marginalized bifactor model. However, an alternative procedure for obtaining the marginalized bifactor model is through projecting the nuisance dimensions of the bifactor model onto the dominant dimension. Projection, which can be viewed as an approximation to numerical integration, has an advantage over numerical integration in providing item parameters for the marginalized bifactor model; therefore, projection could be used with existing equating software packages that require item parameters. In this paper, IRT true-score equating results obtained with projection are compared to those obtained with numerical integration. Simulation results show that the two procedures provide very similar equating results.

In vertical scaling, results of tests from several different grade levels are placed on a common scale. Most vertical scaling methodologies rely heavily on the assumption that the construct being measured is unidimensional. In many testing situations, however, such an assumption could be problematic. For instance, the construct measured at one grade level may differ from that measured in another grade (e.g., construct shift). On the other hand, dimensions that involve low‐level skills are usually mastered by almost all students as they progress to higher grades. These types of changes in the multidimensional structure, within and across grades, create challenges for developing a vertical scale. In this article, we propose the use of projective IRT (PIRT) as a potential solution to the problem. Assuming that a test measures a primary dimension of substantive interest as well as some peripheral dimensions, the idea underlying PIRT is to integrate out the secondary dimensions such that the model provides both item parameters and ability estimates for the primary dimension. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the PIRT as a method for vertical scaling. An example using empirical data from a measure of foundational reading skills is also presented.

The linear composite direction represents, theoretically, where the unidimensional scale would lie within a multidimensional latent space. Using compensatory multidimensional IRT, the linear composite can be derived from the structure of the items and the latent distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the linear composite conjecture and examine how well a fitted unidimensional IRT model approximates the linear composite direction in a multidimensional latent space. Simulation experiment results overall show that the fitted unidimensional IRT model sufficiently approximates linear composite direction when correlation between bivariate latent variables is positive. When the correlation between bivariate latent variables is negative, instability occurs when the fitted unidimensional IRT model is used to approximate linear composite direction. A real data experiment was also conducted using 20 items from a multiple-choice mathematics test from American College Testing.