The nanostructure of engineered bioscaffolds has a profound impact on cell response, yet its understanding remains incomplete as cells interact with a highly complex interfacial layer rather than the material itself. For bioactive glass scaffolds, this layer comprises of silica gel, hydroxyapatite (HA)/carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA), and absorbed proteins—all in varying micro/nano structure, composition, and concentration. Here, we examined the response of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells to 30 mol% CaO–70 mol% SiO2 porous bioactive glass monoliths that differed only in nanopore size (6–44 nm) yet resulted in the formation of HA/CHA layers with significantly different microstructures. We report that cell response, as quantified by cell attachment and morphology, does not correlate with nanopore size, nor HA/CHO layer micro/nano morphology, or absorbed protein amount (bovine serum albumin, BSA), but with BSA’s secondary conformation as indicated by its β-sheet/α-helix ratio. Our results suggest that the β-sheet structure in BSA interacts electrostatically with the HA/CHA interfacial layer and activates the RGD sequence of absorbed adhesion proteins, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, thus significantly enhancing the attachment of cells. These findings provide new insight into the interaction of cells with the scaffolds’ interfacial layer, which is vital for the continued development of engineered tissue scaffolds.
Tissue regeneration is a significantly improved alternative to tissue replacement by implants. It requires porous bioscaffolds for the restoration of natural tissue rather than relying on bio-inactive, often metallic implants. Recently, we developed technology for fabricating novel, nano-macroporous bioactive 'tailored amorphous multi-porous (TAMP)' hard tissue scaffolds using a 70 mol% SiO-30 mol% CaO model composition. The TAMP silicate scaffolds, fabricated by a modified sol-gel process, have shown excellent biocompatibility via the rapid formation of hydroxyapatite in biological fluids as well as in early tests with bone forming cells. Here we report an in depth investigation of the response of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells and bone marrow derived (BMD) osteoclasts to these TAMP scaffolds. Light and electron microscopic imaging, gene and protein expression, and enzyme activity analyses demonstrate that MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts adhere, proliferate, colonize, and differentiate on and inside the bioactive TAMP scaffolds. Additionally, BMD precursor cells mature into active osteoclasts and remodel the scaffold, highlighting the exceptional qualities of this novel scaffold material for bone tissue regeneration.
We analyzed the biological performance of spinodally and droplet-type phase-separated 45S5 Bioglass generated by quenching the melt from different equilibrium temperatures. MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells attached more efficiently to 45S5 Bioglass® with spinodal than to the one with droplet morphology, providing the first demonstration of the role of micro-/nano-scale on the bioactivity of Bioglass®. Upon exposure to biological solutions, phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cell culture medium (α-MEM), a layer of hydroxyapatite (HA) formed on both glass morphologies. Although both Bioglass® varieties were incubated under identical conditions, and physico-chemical characteristics of the HA layers were similar, the adsorption magnitude of a model protein, bovine serum albumin (BSA, an abundant blood serum component) and its β-sheet/β-turn ratio and α-helix content were significantly higher on spinodal than droplet type Bioglass®. These results indicate that: (i) a protein layer quickly adsorbs on the surface of 45S5 Bioglass® varieties (with or without HA layer), (ii) the amount and the conformation of adsorbed proteins are guided by the glass micro-/nano-structure, and (iii) cell attachment and proliferation are influenced by the concentration and the conformation of attached proteins with a significantly better cell adhesion to spinodal type 45S5 Bioglass® substrate. Taken together, our results indicate that the biological performance of 45S5 Bioglass® can be improved further with a relatively simple, inexpensive fabrication procedure that provides a superior glass micro-/nano-structure. A simple modification to the fabrication procedure of classic 45S5 Bioglass® generates spinodal (A(a)) and droplet (A(b)) varieties and has a significant impact on protein adsorption (B) and cell adhesion (C).
For hard tissue regeneration, the bioactivity of a material is measured by its ability to induce the formation of hydroxyapatite (HA) under physiological conditions. It depends on the dissolution behavior of the glass, which itself is determined by the composition and structure of glass. The enhanced HA growth on nanoporous than on nonporous glass has been attributed by some to greater specific surface area (SSA), but to nanopore size distribution by others. To decouple the influence of nanopore size and SSA on HA formation, we have successfully fabricated homogeneous 30CaO-70SiO 2 (30C70S) model bioactive glass monoliths with different nanopore sizes, yet similar SSA via a combination of sol-gel, solvent exchange, and sintering processes. After incubation in PBS, HA, and Type-B carbonated HA (HA/B-CHA) form on nanoporous monoliths. The XPS, FTIR, and SEM analyses provide the first unambiguous demonstration of the influence of nanopore size alone on the formation pathway, growth rate, and microstructure of HA/CHA. Due to pore-size limited diffusion of PO 4 3− , two HA/CHA formation pathways are observed:HA/CHA surface deposition and/or HA/CHA incorporation into nanopores. HA/CHA growth rate on the surface of a nanoporous glass monolith is dominated by the pore-size limited transport of Ca 2+ ions dissolved from nanoporous glass substrates. Furthermore, with increasing nanopore size, HA/CHA microstructures evolve from needle-like, plate-like, to flower-like appearance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.